Skip to main content

Commercialising Political Experience: Can George Yeo Turn His International And Regional Relationship Into Commercial Assets?



Former foreign minister George Yeo has been appointed senior adviser to Malaysian conglomerate Kuok Group as reported in the media.  What actually does a senior adviser do? Can his advice add value to a private business enterprise?

We don’t know yet and it is also too early to tell.  However, he has at least proved that he has some market values even without a government job.  Kuok Group may not pay him as well as the Singapore tax payers but anyway, he manages to find a job other than an offer from GLCs. In this, we have to respect him (so do Lim Hwee Hua) for stepping out the comfort zones.

Lim is different from George as she was in the finance and investment sector before joining the government. George is first a military man and then turns into a politician and minister.  

His market value seems to be in his foreign relationship.  From his facebook pages, you can see that he visited here and there and met up with foreign friends. He certainly has more experiences in international and regional development than his other PAP ministers, perhaps, even better than PM Lee.

But having knowledge and experience is one thing, providing strategy and advice is another thing.  You are some body when you are in power but another person when you are out of power.  Therefore, acting like a philosopher and providing different possibilities without implementing the selected strategy may be best matched by George’s character and intelligence.
For this, he has no executive power over his advisory and he does not need to report to shareholders of the Group.  

Business owners may or may not accept advices from their advisers. An adviser has less responsibility as compared to a minister. A minister has to shoulder the negative impact of his ministry’s policies, just like Wong Kan Seng and Mah Bao Tan. Both lost their ministerial jobs after GE2011.

But will George be happy by just giving advices to private business group?  Is this the best way out for a thinker like him?

Singapore “Al Gore” – a possibility?

George is a busy man.  I wonder how much time he has for the Kuok Group for his advisory work. Besides being a visiting scholar at NUS, he also involves and advises many foreign organisations:
    
- Chairing the International Advisory Panel of the Nalanda University Governing Board;
- Member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum;
- Member of the Nicolas Berggruen Institute's 21st Century Council and
- Member of the International Advisory Boards of Harvard Business School and IESE Business School.

May be a few more.

As a knowledge man, perhaps he can contribute things on East-West cultural exchanges and help to show off the soft power of Singapore. Singapore is well known for our economic success. So, why not do some things on the soft power?

George has less financial worry as Singapore tax payers have paid him well enough through the pension scheme. He should consider contributing something on the arts, cultural and values to the world.

Just like Al Gore, who lost the controversial President Election in the USA, but he keeps himself moving to another personal achievement in environment. I think George’s interest is not on business profit making and his best matched activity is some things like philosophy and thinking.

Will we see a Singapore “Al Gore” in the making?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。