Skip to main content

Is It A Cultural Ignorance Of NUS Or Chinese Patriotism Or Both?



This must be a shock to the National University of Singapore (NUS) over a test of general knowledge in China. A test of general knowledge, in return, is a test of our general knowledge and cultural understanding of China.

This cultural ignorance about China is much serious than the recent shortage of examination papers in NUS as cultural understanding can not be solved overnight. It seems the university or Singapore at large has a long way to go even though there are many Chinese experts and Chinese exchanged scholars in our campuses.  

Chinese, American and Singapore students

To NUS professors, asking Chinese students to write a short answer to “what have you learned from the Wenzhou train accident?" may be is similar to asking American students on “what have you learned from 911?”

Unfortunately, one cannot expect Chinese students to have the same reaction as the American students. Or, perhaps Chinese students are more patriot than the American students.  Or, NUS testers are treating Chinese students like Singapore students that they never voice out even they are unhappy, especially NUS is a recruiting agency and the Chinese students are applying for the scholarship.

Not to forget, these Chinese students are not ordinary people.  They are from one of the top Chinese universities, Fudan University. Once recruited, they are foreign talents to us.  Some may take up citizenship, stand for election and hold appointments one day.  

Not to surprise, Wenzhou high speed train incident can also be a high school examination topic next year in China. You may wonder why the Chinese can ask themselves the same question and being an outsider, we can’t. Why within China, this is a lesson and the same question from outsiders, it is an insult?   

Further surprise is if selected, the complained student will still come to Singapore.  Why? Perhaps, for his personal reason, he can do a Masters in NUS and continue to do a PhD in the USA. Or perhaps, it is for his friends, his family or even a business opportunity.  Chinese are more flexible in thinking and in action than us.

Chinese patriotism can begin from a small incident like a test paper because it touches on the recent setback in China’s high speed train project.  It can also arises from historical events, like Second World War (Nanjing Massacre), 918 (Japan invasion of Northeast China), 77 (incident of 卢沟Lugou bridge that led to Japan and China war), May 4 (against unfair treaty with Japan) etc.

Twitter is no match to weibo in China

An issue sometimes can become a big issue or a crisis if the matter is not handled properly.  Their weibo is more powerful than our twitter. Wenzhou train crash was first reported over weibo minutes after the accident. The Wenzhou accident quick becomes a national issue with suspected cover-ups and corrupt practices because the Chinese transport authority did not explain it properly (or openly).

Is the complained Fudan student representing all university students in China?  No. In the history of China, there are some groups of people who are willing to die for the country for whatever reasons but not all of them.  The Fudan student may belong to the former groups of people or in that particular moment, he is one of them.

A test of wisdom and Singapore

To outsiders, it is a test of wisdom on how to distinguish different groups of Chinese and their behaviours. Unfortunately, Singapore students are still struggling with the learning and teaching of Chinese.  In an interview with Zaobao, Minister Heng Swee Keat admitted MOE faced a challenge to teach Chinese to English speaking families.  
教育部长王瑞杰接受本报专访时说,教育部现在面临的挑战是如何在家庭用语倾向英语的趋势下,继续加强华文教学的研究,以协助教师有效和生动地教导华文. http://www.zaobao.com.sg/sp/sp111005_001.shtml

If our professors misread the Chinese, can our students, who have poor command of Chinese, have a better understanding of Chinese than our university professors?

At the end of the day, may be we should ask ourselves “what have we learned from the NUS incident in Shanghai?” And have we and the NUS learned some lessons about Chinese patriotism and cultures after this incident?  

Because of the importance of China, I am 100% sure NUS had no intention to belittle or disrespect the Wenzhou train tragedy. However, NUS did apology to those affected students (original omy Chinese report). 

Does the apology really mean anything to the Chinese?  Will they appreciate your efforts of educating their brightest students?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。