Skip to main content

Wrong headlines to the wrong readers – The dilemma of Chinese language in Singapore



Former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew launched his Chinese version of Hard Truths last week. But the headlines of Chinese and English medium are quite different and it serves no benefit to both medium readers by not giving the true picture of Lee’s speech.
Simply put it. Both medium are giving the wrong headlines to the wrong readers. There is no impact and it will not stimulate the learning of Chinese language in Singapore.
Zaobao gives a strong message to Chinese readers who already have the knowledge of Chinese language. Why sells something to a buyer who already has the product and know the importance of owning it?

Lee Kuan Yew: Future regrets if you don’t understand Chinese
李光耀: 不谙华语将来后悔莫及

Regret or no regret depending on who you are
Let see the headlines of the English medium to make a comparison:

Bilingualism crucial for future generations: Mr Lee (Asiaone, 17 Sept)

Bilingualism is possible in Singapore, says Lee Kuan Yew (CNA 16 Sept)

Lee Kuan Yew launches Chinese edition of Hard Truths, turns 88 (ST 17 Sept)


Bilingualism is possible, says Lee Kuan Yew
(Today, 17 Sept)


If you are an English reader, after reading the above headlines, will you be moved to learn the Chinese language? The Asiaone headline may provide the financial incentive to learn Chinese but what is the real reason for wanting to learn Chinese for Chinese Singaporeans?

It is about your root

Former PM Lee did say something on it. However, this is missing in the English medium. Zaobao reported it as follows:

“To survive in Singapore, it will be hard without knowing English.  However, you will regret if you don’t have Mandarin.  It has nothing to do with the emergence of China.  It is because you need to know your root.”   

要在新加坡生存,没有英语会很辛苦,没有华语则一定会后悔莫及。这并不是因为中国崛起,是因为你自己要了解你自己的根。

It is really a tall order. For many Singaporeans, our root is English not Chinese. This is why when the English medium report on the Chinese Hard Truths, they all want to select a headline to comfort their readers.

A strong language or message like the one in Zaobao may not serve the English readers well.  But in such a way who is telling the Hard Truths about the Chinese language in Singapore.  Zaobao, Straits Times, Today, Channelnewsasia all are telling the true stories to their readers or just want to please them by selecting the right angle to report on the Chinese Hard Truths.

Is Zaobao a main stream paper?

Zaobao is a main stream paper but certainly not the main stream of the main stream.  The honor has to go to the Straits Times and/or CNA.

So, the officially main stream position is there is no regret and there is no Chinese root to search for.  

Even though the honorable Lee Kuan Yew used the words of regret and root (in his Chinese speech), the real main stream media can still select headlines and key points that they want to report on. 

They may have a point as Lee did not say it in his English speech and so the official position is no regret no root as the master language in Singapore is English.

This, perhaps, is one of the biggest hard truths in Singapore. The controlled media is telling different readers different hard truths that they should receive from the main stream media. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...