Skip to main content

Will there be a difference if the leaks by WikiLeaks were made before GE2011 and PE2011?




It is such a co-incidence that the release of the leaks by WikiLeaks happened immediately after PE2011. It was unclear whether WikiLeaks did it for the advantage of the PAP or just simply a co-incidence.

In fact, the leaked information could be dated back to as early as 2005, 6 years ago. If WikiLeaks has the manpower to organise the information and releases them earlier, for example, before GE2011 and PE2011, would it make any impact to our elections? Will there be a difference to the results of the general election and presidential election?

No one can answer this question. Perhaps, just a co-incidence and just not so good luck for the oppositions, otherwise, they can create another front to attack the PAP.  May be not, as released by one the leaks, our main stream media will be under pressure to report on the leaked information.

We have to give the benefit of doubt to WikiLeaks that they released the leaks immediately after PE2011 is their own planning and schedule.  

Just a repeat and re-confirmation of rumours

The leaked information on Singapore is just a repeat and re-confirmation of the ‘rumours’, untrue facts, hear-says, coffee shop talks, and other funny stories, like

Education: MOE has no intention to create more university places for Singaporeans.

Free press: We all know about that the main stream media is under the control of the PAP.

Entrepreneurship: The monopoly of government linked companies in Singapore economy is an obstacle to Singapore private businesses.

Candidates: Poor quality of the PAP candidates and the difficulty of recruiting high and good candidates from the private sector.

Tactics and strategies: Defamation sues and the lack of independence of Singapore Judiciary in political cases 

Growth model: Emphasis on economic growth at the expense of welfare and widening rich-poor gap.

People: The PAP is out of touch with the people and has less concern of the poor and disadvantaged.

Immigration:  It is too relax and there are too many foreigners in Singapore.  

All the above are the common topics circulating in our daily conversations, over the internet, coffee shops and hawker centres in the past few years. Most of them have been known to us but just without confirmation.  

Why do we need the Americans to confirm the rumours?

It is strange that we need the WikiLeaks to re-confirm or repeat the rumours or news. Why can’t we do the job ourselves? Do we need to depend on the Americans to give their opinions and views on our country?

Our Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as usual, has no comment on issues like this. 

So, the leaks can still be rumours, untrue stories, hear-says, and busybody talks without confirmation.   
Why are the Americans so busybody to feedback to the State Department about rumours in Singapore? Will they make decisions and political judgements on rumours?  

If yes, then we need to seriously consider the rumours too.

Are the suggesting that many rumours can turn into true stories and become fact in Singapore? Next time, when your surf the net, you better ask yourself whether you are reading a piece of rumour or reading a fact, may be few years later, in another WikiLeaks, you will see the answer.  

So, besides white house perhaps there is another white dragon in the making.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...