Skip to main content

儿子太笨,老爸辛苦,无奈的不得已


红楼梦第57回,贾宝玉哭道:凭他是谁,除了林妹妹,都不许姓林!贾宝玉爱林黛玉爱痴了,不许其他人性林。有时,爱一个人,爱一个党,爱一个国,爱得太深,真是会爱出病来,说出太过离谱的话来。

李前总理日前在李光耀政策学院的讲话,否定新加坡有足够的人才来组成两支顶尖的团队。然而他希望新加坡国会只是出现一个具有竞争力的反对党,而不是两党制。李前总理或许太爱行动党,太爱新加坡,只希望行动党来带头领导这支顶尖的团队。

顶尖领导未必来自行动党

即使,新加坡只出现一支顶尖团队,也未必是行动党的闪电队伍,可能是行动党温和派和反对党的联合队伍,也可能是反对党强大到足以组成本身的新加坡顶尖领导队伍。面对现实,尤其是行动党保守派,他们以过去的方法来治国的策略,已经无法迎合民心。

今年的大选和总统选举的结果已经显示全国的人才,并没有全部集中在行动党。我国政治趋势的发展,令行动党担心的是,下次大选,将无法吸引到足够的一流人才作为候选人。没有人才的行动党,如何组成新加坡顶尖的领导团队?

具有竞争力的反对党,只在国会发发声?

什么是一个具有竞争力的反对党?一个有竞争力的反对党,当然是希望不断强大,有朝一日,上台做政府,组成新加坡的顶尖团队来领导国家。如果一个有竞争力的反对党,正如李前总理说的,在国会里发发声,而这声音具有竞争力就可以了。那么,这将是一个没有出息的反对党,很可能还会被选民认为是行动党钦定的反对党,留下历史恶名。过去。在国会里做戏式的提问,不可能再出现了。

反对党只为选票,不理财政?

李前总理担心的两党制,极可能最终会在新加坡出现。但是,他也不需提心吊胆,认为反对党上台就会把国库花光,而产生动用储备的脑筋。他害怕,他担心,反对党利用花钱的伎俩来骗选票。事实上,行动党不也在一直利用国家的钱,做着保留行动党政权,维续行动党政府的工作吗?

事实上,国人在总统选举中已经极为担心我国的外汇储备,这笔钱到底如何的投资,是否正如政府说的有那么多的外汇储备,国人似乎永远都看不到储备的真实情形,也担心公积金的回笼。因此,即使行动党利用陈庆炎这样的顶尖人才出马,也只能获得35%的支持票。

行动党向中共学习什么?

行动党和中国共产党已经建立了党对党的联系,不时,还会派代表到中国学习,向中共偷师。凤凰网今天的两篇报道,或许值得行动党注意:

《朱镕基爱看港报:内地的报纸上找不到骂我的文章》


《温家宝914日在大连世界经济论坛2011年新领军者年会的回答:第一,坚持依法治国。一个执政党最重要的任务就是要依照宪法和法律办事,并且严格在宪法和法律范围内活动,这就需要改变以党代政,把权力绝对化和权力过分集中的现象。为此,必须改革党和国家的领导制度。这个任务是邓小平先生在30年以前就提出来的,我认为在今天尤为紧迫

或许,上述的论点,就是李前总理说的一个有竞争力的反对党在国会发发声音,就如,朱镕基说的看看一下香港报纸,温家宝说的不要过分集中权力,让其他的人也有发声的机会。但是,中国人民会满意这样发发声,就把事情给结束了,了结的做法吗?他们也要看中国政府有没有做事,把事情办好。

同样地在新加坡,人民也要当家做主,不一定要选行动党作为顶尖队伍的领导,也可以选其他的组合,甚至选反对党来当家做主。

行动党的下一代,能否继续传承下去?

我们在媒体上,看到太多这样的例子。东方的父母,华人的父母往往被孩子拖累,一世的英明被毁了。儿子太笨,不争气,老爸辛苦,无奈的不得已。

中国的官二代,富二代,经常在媒体上曝光,打人闹事,已经
凸显了这个问题的严重性。做父母的希望孩子成才,没有想到孩子竟然这么不争气,把父母的一生成就毁于一旦。

我们的问题没有这样严重,但是问题仍然存在。即使所谓接受洋式教育的我国精英领导,不也或多或少为了维护孩子,要出动白马政策,保护孩子。陈庆炎一直到现在,还说不清他孩子的国民服役,奖学金的疑问。

不论如何,这也显现行动党的下一代,或者说,这些领导的下一代,在我国的公平竞争制度下,任人唯贤的政策下,未必将是国家未来的顶尖领导的一份子。因此,如果,新加坡只有一支顶尖领导团队,那么,这支队伍的领导就未必是行动党或行动党的下一代。

在这点上, 即使在新加坡这个所谓的奉行西方教育,西方法制,西方民主的国家,英文为主的国家,在处理亲情这个问题上,东西方任然还是有分别的。

我们应该学习西方的大气,曾认事实,面对现实。自己的下一代,未必比其他人的下一代强,苦苦要维系,继续自己的江山,行动党的一党独大的政府,又何苦呢?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...