Skip to main content

The Visionary Singapore May Not Necessarily Be Led By the PAP


Singapore has entered an era of no great leaders.  In fact, when Goh Chok Tong took over as Prime Minister in the 1990s, Singapore had already begun a new phrase of leadership renewal without strong leaders.

From independence until the 1990s, Singapore experienced strong leadership and teamwork. The first generation PAP leaders have helped to build up an ultimate creation that functions like a self-renewal organization that is called Singapore Inc.  We may not totally agree with how the Singapore Inc is being established.  However, we should thank and give credit to the PAP for creating such a strong and powerful organization. 

Singapore Inc is the ultimate creation

When the Singapore Inc was established, the founding members and leaders of the PAP were idealists and had certain philosophies in mind to a Singapore or a Malaysia.

It is not a purely economic reason.  The first generation leaders had their visions, missions and values in mind and based on these beliefs they built up Singapore Inc.  Just like a visionary company, a pure profit maximization vision will not go too far and last too long.

Half way in my writing, I suddenly realize I don’t quite understanding what Singapore vision or value is. We are quite remote from the Swiss standard of living as promised. And 5C certainly cannot be a vision for most of Singaporeans.

Perhaps, we should go back to history and the 1969 National Pledge can be considered as our vision:

We, the citizens of Singapore,
pledge ourselves as one united people,
regardless of race, language or religion,
to build a democratic society
based on justice and equality
so as to achieve happiness, prosperity and
progress for our nation.

Since 1966, we have achieved some common identities and in a certain way English is also the common language for the locals. 

But how far are we away from the 1969 vision?  The PAP has itself in the past 20, 30 years intentionally moving away from its own created vision. But Singaporeans under the education and training of the Singapore Inc have remained and continued with this spirit and vision. 

And who is right and who is wrong? The PAP, especially the conservative, looking for profit maximization and high economic growth is moving away from the National Pledge or the majority of the Singaporeans.

Singapore Inc is not the PAP
 
However, this Singapore Inc is not belonged to the PAP and it now belongs to all Singaporeans.  The PAP is the creator but no more the owner of Singapore Inc. It belongs to both the PAP and non-PAP supporters. Importantly, it is wrong to continue to assume everything in Singapore Inc is belonged to the PAP.

The PAP, especially their first generation leadership, must have the confidence on their created product: Singapore inc.  And they have to accept that their children of their children may be the leaders of the oppositions.

During GE2011, when PM Lee mentioned about the 4th generation leadership of the PAP, he seemed to forget the existence of Singapore Inc and its potential, under the Singapore National Pledge, to produce future leaders.  

There is a succession plan in our 1966 vision. The ultimate creation of Singapore Inc will create the new leaders of Singapore in its own way but not the PAP way. It will come naturally, but not necessarily from the PAP, for the PAP but for Singaporeans at large. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...