Skip to main content

Sustainable Singapore or Sustainable Population, does it matter under IPAT model?


During the parliament debate on Population White Paper, both the PAP government and WP used ‘sustainability’ to argue their cases.  One used it for Singapore (WP) and the other used it for Population (PAP).  Really, does it make any difference?    
The PAP government’s white paper wants to achieve “A Sustainable Population for A Dynamic Singapore”.   However, WP argues for “A Dynamic Population for a Sustainable Singapore”.   Which argument will give us a better living environment and quality of life?

A.Using population to achieve a dynamic Singapore or
B.  Using Singapore to achieve a dynamic population.  

IPAT equation
IPAT equation is commonly used for environment impact analysis and as we know the environment will affect the quality of life of Singapore core.
I = PAT is the lettering of a formula put forward to describe the impact of human activity on the environment. I = P × A × T 
In words:Human Impact (I) on the environment equals the product of P= Population, A= Affluence, T= Technology. This describes how our growing population, affluence, and technology contribute toward our environmental impact. The equation can aid in understanding some of the factors affecting human impacts on the environment.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_%3D_PAT)
Singapore is an immigrant country and since independence in 1965, Singapore has increased its population as well as its economy rapidly. So much so that we have to think of sustainability in terms of many aspects: land, environment, population, economy, social development etc.

A country is made up of its people, especially its citizens. In the recent Parliament debate, the life quality of citizen core was the key points of argument.  

http://www.thwink.org/sustain/articles/011_IPAT_Equation/index.htm

However, Singapore’s case is unique as it is different from the IPAT equation for developed countries and looks more towards an IPAT model for developing countries.

IPAT for developed countries
To reduce the human impacts on environment, the model for developed countries will look like this:

P stable (population stable or reducing)
A down (high GNP, need to cut down consumption)   
T down (using technology more environmental friendly production)

A developed economy will try to make changes to reduce consumption and improved technology to reduce the environment impacts. A better environment or healthy environment will improve the quality of life.  This is why we talk about Swiss standard of living many years ago.

The challenges or options for change are A and T: to cut down ‘the consumption per person’ (due to affluence) and to bring down ‘the environmental damage per unit of consumption’ (help by technology).

IPAT for developing countries
To reduce the human impacts on environment, the developing countries will do the followings:

P up (e.g. population reduction through birth control, education, jobs for women)
A up (becoming affluence, GNP per capita increasing, consumptions up, to reduce consumption for less stress on environment)   
T down (using latest technology for production)

A developing country will try to make changes to reduce population and consumption; and improved technology used to reduce the environment impacts. A better environment or healthy environment will improve the quality of life (e.g. longer life span, better education and health care).  This is the early days of Singapore from 1965 to maybe 1980s.

The challenges or options for change are P, A and T. There are big population size and continuing growing; increasing affluence leading to higher ‘consumption per person’ and technology/ways to bring down ‘the environmental damage per unit of consumption’.

The case of Singapore
Singapore’s case is unique that we are a developed country but facing the challenges like a developing country, especially from the arguments of the government published (parliament endorsed) Population White Paper.

P Up (Singapore wants to increase population size by bringing in more immigrants)
A Up (emphasis on economic growth and to increase income further so consumption will go up)   

T down (in basically 2 approaches: using advanced and latest technology for manufacturing activities and little agricultural activities. Also Singapore is a service industry economy.  It is able to cut down environmental impacts or damage by improving technology in manufacturing and service industry as well as transferring some environmental damages to other countries, especially in primary and agricultural industries)  

Sustainable Population or Sustainable Singapore?
The PAP government white paper wants to have “A Sustainable Population for A Dynamic Singapore”.   They suggest:  

P up (increase population to a possible worst case scenario of 6.9 million)
A up (3-4% per year 2013-2020, 2-3% per year 2020-2030)
T down

However, the opposition Worker’ Party (WP) wants to have “A Dynamic Population for a Sustainable Singapore”. In this case,

P stable (cap at 5.9 million)  
A stable (slower growth rate, 2.5%-3.5% 2013-2020, 1.5%-2.5% 2020-2030)
T down

WP arguments for less population increased are: 
<We believe this rate can be achieved with productivity improvements at the same rate as that proposed in the White Paper, but with less population injections, if we can utilise more of our existing population. We could target to grow our resident workforce by 1% per year, by getting more foreign spouses, home-makers and seniors back to work. Second, our senior citizens may not be as much of a burden as the government makes out. >http://wp.sg/2013/02/a-dynamic-population-for-a-sustainable-singapore-reclaiming-back-singapore-mp-sylvia-lim/

Is Singapore a developed country?

In many ways, the PAP is denying our achievement and success.  It still considers Singapore as a developing country (and there are many advantages in the international world for being a developing country).

A developing country uses population (P) to grow economy, and increase consumption due to affluence and improved income (I).   

The PAP government is using the IPAT equation for developing countries to deny citizen core to have a better standard of living and quality of life.

It is not surprise that the low income workers do not have real income increase for more than 10 years. Despite affluence we still have housing, education, transport problems.  

After all, in the eyes of the PAP leaders, Singapore is still a developing country and the PAP wants to keep the status quo for as long as they are in power!
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。