Skip to main content

公开的透明的同时展示人口数据和经济数据在国人面前。

人口白皮书已经在国会以7713票通过了。这是行动党政府未来的政策,治国方向。人口问题现在已经和经济问题同样的重要,有关人口的数据,应该像经济数据那样,每个季度公开的透明的展示在国人面前,不能再过去那样资料不全,令人无法信任行动党政府的诚意。 
77:13的比例根本不能和行动党2011年大选的得票相比。现在,国人对人口白皮书的意见和政府的建议目标相差很大,为了弥补人们的心理落差,为了让核心新加坡人放心,政府很有必要详细,详尽的公布人口数据。公民,永久居民,非永久居民,外劳女佣,等等数据都应该一一详细的向人民报告。

不然,如何监督政府,如何知道政府是否会像以前一样,缺少20/20的远见。事情发生后,才来说‘变化赶不上计划’, 基础设施跟不上,让国人感到压力,不舒服。

经济增长是一个指标,现在,人口增长也是一个指标。既然是指标,经济数据可以详细的报告,人口数据,也应该如实的详细向人民报告。这才会让国人觉得行动党政府的诚意。
《“人民所表达的情绪,我是可以理解的。”“让我再次澄清,690万人不是一个目标。李显龙总理今天在国会表示,民众一个普遍的看法是,政府应该集中精力,去解决人民眼前的问题,而不是处理长远的问题。》http://news.xin.msn.com/zh/

总理在国会发表了超过一个小时的感性演说,就是要说服国会接受人口白皮书的建议。但是,正如总理说的今天的新加坡和独立时的新加坡不一样。新加坡人已经有了认同感,共同的意识,甚至新加坡精神。如果,我们能够保留这种精神和团结在在一起,我们将能为我们的孩子创造更美好的明天。政府是用心来制定政策的。#2 
如果真的心系人民,关心人民,把国人的利益放在第一位,人口数据的透明公开,更是一件不可缺少的事情。这不但让占人口多数的华人放心,更可以让少数族群的马来人和印度人放心。
行动党政府说,它不是以经济挂帅,不是只追求经济增长,不是只追求利润,那么,我们就要拿经济数据和人口数据做比较,看看它的经济和人口表现指标做得如何?

国会通过人口白皮书是很容易的事,因为行动党拥有国会的绝对多数。但是,通过容易,执行并不容易,公开透明的执行就更不容易了。行动党政府已经有先例,过去几十年,在人口问题上并不那么老实,没有详细的清楚的把人口数据公开出来。

即使是这一刻,我们的实际人口是多少,公民和永久居民的实际人数是多少,为何把公民和永久居民捆在一起?

13张反对人口白皮书的票中,有三张来自官委议员。其余10张来自在野党议员。因此,连比较中立的官方委任的议员都对人口白皮书有意见,行动党政府更是有必要让人放心,它在执行人口政策时,是以新加坡人的利益作为出发点。

我们期待看到更多的人口数据,更加详细的数据。既然口口声声说不是以经济为第一,那么,经济数据可以公开透明,为何人口数据不可。这样的要求会太过分吗?



#2
 “If we retain our spirit and work together, we can create a much better tomorrow for our children. This is my promise to all Singaporeans. You are at the heart of all our policies.”
http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/pm-lee-hsien-loong-speaks-parliament-white-paper-population

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...