Skip to main content

人口白皮书能落实阿连的故事吗?勤能补拙的人机会有吗?

阿连的故事现在人人知晓,父母们现在可以告诉孩子,新年新希望,勤能补拙,大家都能和阿连一样出人头地,创出一番事业来。人口白皮书真的能够给人们带来这个希望吗?
华人新年快到了,家长们都希望小孩听话,多读点书,用功读书,考到好成绩,天资差一点不要紧,只要勤能补拙,最后还是能出人头地的。就像阿连在榜鹅东一样,一举打败一个医生,一个经济学家和一个首席工程师。

是谁给阿连作为候选人的机会?

李总理也是这么称赞阿连的,从N水准,O水准,义安理工,然后大学,然后成为候选人。因此,阿连的表现证明行动党建立的制度是好的#1。是的,行动党的确给人勤能补拙的机会,但是,在最后最重要的关头,行动党会给像阿连这样的人机会作为候选人吗?

答案应该很明显。阿连没有机会,阿发也没有机会,行动党不会给阿连,阿发,阿花,阿成机会。因此,行动党在人口白皮书中的一再的强调人才,外来人才,只有这些人才能为新加坡带来希望,勤能补拙没有问题,只要能读书,机会还是有的,但是要再往上爬,在行动党的人口人才论下,机会不是留给勤能补拙的人。

新加坡的专业,经理,行政和技术人员(PEMT)们的一个普遍投诉,就是没有机会进一步向上升,而外国人才却机会连连。事实是否真的如此,见仁见智,但是这最少说明,勤能补拙之外,就未必平等,尤其是在行动党的人才标准下,NO水准,甚至理工学院,普通大学,怎能纳入喝咖啡的人选呢?
是谁给阿连阿发这个机会?工人党。是谁尊重勤能补拙并给予机会成为候选人?工人党。因此,当工人党在国会提出590万人口这个数目字的时候,它考虑的是新加坡应该公平的对待公民,给新加坡人这个勤能补拙后的晋升机会。行动党会这么考虑问题吗?当人力不够的时候,它的解决方法就是引进人口。
难怪,当工人党提出在“现有的基础上,不额外增加外劳人数,而把重点放在新加坡的现有居民,每年增加1%的人力供应到2020年”时#2,行动党的议员部长反应那么的激烈。因为,行动党考虑的是最容易最方便的解决方法,勤能补拙需要这么多机会,这么多的鼓励吗?更何况,那些达不到勤能补拙的新加坡人,这么费神,这么用力的鼓励人们加入工作队伍,值不值得?

是的,当我们讲效率,讲回报时,这么做是很傻,很可能事倍功半,花出去的成本比回收来的高,还可能高出很多,那政府不是要倒贴,要亏本了吗?政府倒贴新加坡人,政府亏本给新加坡人,不是技能发展基金一直在做吗?为何一直在做,还做不好呢?为何基金只是拨款给予某些特定的机构呢?

是谁明白小市民的心声?



有没有听过《小人物的心声》?这首歌是新加坡人的歌,代表了新加坡的过去,也代表了的未来。行动党或许已经忘记了小人物的心声,而不认同小人物的心声也代表未来。
行动党看到人才,外来人才,人口白皮书,没有看到小人物的心声,只看到大人物的伟伦。而这个伟伦是建立在没有公布并未加说明的资料,数据和理论的基础上。

当阿连说她已经跑遍100%榜鹅东的组屋时,这就叫勤能补拙。这个勤能补拙只能胜过对手的专业,对手的没有达到100%。最后,还是要靠选民的支持,选民认可,选民给阿连进国会的机会。阿连知道即使工人党给她这个机会,没有选民的支持,给予机会,阿连的希望还是不能落实。


当阿连在当选后,回到榜鹅东答谢选民时,她受到的热烈欢迎代表了什么?小人物的心声。选民在阿连身上看到了希望,选民认同阿连的勤能补拙,认同工人党给她出战的机会,而人口白皮书会给新加坡人这个希望吗?


当居民为阿连欢呼时,他们也在为自己欢呼。小人物是有可能有出头的时候,但是,行动党不给小人物这个机会。小人物的机会来自另一边,来自工人党。勤能补拙只能打好基础,没有机会,阿连阿发阿花阿成,还是小人物。行动党自1959年以来,就是如此。和《小人物的心声》出炉的年代相比,现在的小人物比以前的小人物是否更有希望出头?答案已经写在榜鹅东补选的成绩上了。

当国会辩论人口白皮书时,这或许是大人物在说话,在发表伟伦,政府在自我辩论,自我辩护。但是,不论怎么辩论,怎么自圆其说,一个离开小人物期望的辩论,一个背弃小人物心声的白皮书,最后的结果,将是不得人心。

因此,与其说工人党胜了榜鹅东,倒不如说是小人物心声的控诉,小人物胜了榜鹅东补选。难怪,刘程强不敢居功,因为,没有了人民,没有选民的支持,你就是想当政府也当不了。

最后,在结束博文前,还想送上赵传的《我是一支小小鸟》,真的,小人物的明天会不会比昨天更好,人口白皮书会不会给小人物带来希望?对小人物来说,幸福是否是一种传说永远都找不到?


#1
“She went to N levels, she did her O levels, and went to Ngee Ann Polytechnic and did well, and later on got a degree on her own and now she is a candidate. So I say she shows that the Singapore system built by the PAP is a good one!” 
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/pm-lee-says-%E2%80%98pap-is-on-your-side%E2%80%99--rebuts-wp%E2%80%99s-low-150126524.html


#2
They both delved into greater detail on the idea of not adding new foreign workers to the existing workforce -- apart from replacing outgoing ones -- while focusing efforts on growing the resident labour population in Singapore (consisting of citizens and permanent residents) by one per cent each year until 2020.
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/wp%E2%80%99s-chen-show-mao-takes-fire-in-parliament-over-5-9-million-projection-092237568.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...