Skip to main content

iSaw - A rare opportunity to know how the government thinks and works

 

We should welcome the blog of Saw Phaik Hwa and thank her for sharing with us her experience in running a GLC.  Looking back, we have not seen any one from any GLC who are willing to stand forward to be assessed and evaluated. We certainly like to see and hear the success story of Temasek Holdings, but will there be one? Will Temasek CEO share with you how the billions dollars are invested?

So, at least Saw dares to step forward and provides her side of story.  Good or bad, right or wrong we respect her views and appreciate her sharing. 

Certainly, SMRT is related to the government and its operations and services are the reflections of the PAP mindsets towards voters. We can see how a listed public company making use of monopoly, public facilities, funds and finance to enrich the public and themselves. We hope to read the philosophy of (SMRT) public service in Singapore and the attitude of government towards its citizens in basic transport services.  

Perhaps, Saw is too proud of what she had done at SMRT and by sharing her experience and achievement with us; she can then justify her “high or not so high?” salary. Readers will judge her performance with other stated owned metro corporations in the world and understand the motive and rational for making a public good profitable.

We hope she can share more and disclose more management issues and service philosophy. This will certainly make a good case study for business schools and management consultancy. We rarely and hardly see a profitable public transport company in the world.  The case of SMRT will prove to the world that it is possible to make public transport profitable and it can be a quality standard and benchmark for business excellence in communications sector.   

Not to forget, the efficiency of our public transport system is one of the key factors that Singapore achieved high standing in international competitiveness.  So, there is a good reason to read iSaw and find out the secret success recipe of our mass rapid transit system.  

Saw talked about how she prevented “huge fare increases” by raising revenue.  It will be interesting to hear from her the $1.1 billion buses subsidy to SBS and SMRT.  Is this because there is no more way to increase revenue anymore? Have all the SMRT retail spaces already been used and developed? If she can prevent huge subsidy from government to SMRT, then her million dollar compensation is really worth paying for.  And more importantly, SMRT should re-employ and reinstate her CEO position as she can help to save public money for unnecessary subsidy.             

We look forward for more interesting revelations from iSaw. And we hope the government will not stop iSaw for doing so.  Unfortunately, there is a possibility that the more she reveals, there more uncomfortable and embarrass the government will be - just like how she shows off her luxury life style to the public! 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more