Skip to main content

Learning is for oneself, others or money. Can the MOE’s character building kit help students making a better decision?


The Ministry of Education (MOE) has developed a tool kit for character building for students in our schools. Besides schools, Minister for Education Heng Swee Keat also wanted parents to play a part in developing their children’s character and value.

"Parents play the most critical role in the upbringing of the children, in inculcating the right values and building the character of their children," he said.

"Indeed, parents are the ones who know their children best. So there has to be a very strong partnership between the parents and schools, and also between the schools and the broader community. (CNA)
In the process of character building and development, we must include the purpose and meaning of learning and studying too.  Students must have the courage to quite the learning and study at schools to seek and search for their own interest, if they think it is the right thing to do. Just like Bill Gates and Steven Jobs did.  Otherwise, if students keep the usual path, then Singapore will not be able to produce innovative and creative products that change the world. 

I am not encouraging students to quite study blindly.  However, the value of education and the return on investment for a university education has gone down as noticed in the western world.  It is important for students to recognize this trend and instead of pursing a degree, especially a degree that not his or her interest, it is better to opt out to do something that gives himself happiness and fulfilling one’s interest.

This is the courage and determination that we hope to build up during the growing up years of a student in schools.  While building and developing their character, they also learn to make decisions that will match their interest and at the same time, can contribution to the society and our country. 

More than 2,000 years ago, Confucius had a famous saying: In the past, the purpose of learning was for self interest, now the purpose was to please others.”  (古之学者为己,今之学者为人)The “now” was referring to the time periods of spring-autumn and warring states. Today, the purpose of learning even goes one step further.  It is for the money.

10, 20 years ago, parents wanted their children to be professionals, like doctors, lawyers, architects, even engineers. These professionals not only carry the prestige that is recognized by the society but also offer well paying jobs and more money. 

However, since we enter the higher level of economic development, service industry has become the new normal for money and wealth creation. It is the finance sector that produces easy and quick money – no wonder we have the financial and debt crisis. It seems that there are too many intelligent people wanted to out perform the market and created more and more financial products that they themselves might not know the real meaning of investing.

Certainly, many of these so-called intelligent people and top students/scholars working in the financial sectors have lost their moral value.

When Minister Heng urged parents to help in developing their children’s character, parents should not emphasize too much on money matters.  Rather, it is important to help to develop the right value and encouraging children to study for their own interest.

A word of caution for working parents, please don’t leave the character building and developing to the maids. A child’s character is developed through pregnancy, home and schools.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

梁文辉可能有点傻, 但却是真的真情流露。