Skip to main content

Besides labor and talents, Singaporeans face competition of foreign money too.

 

Being an international city and centre for financial activities, foreign money are free to move in and out of Singapore to take advantage of the investment opportunities here, including property.  

 

With a limited population, and a stable increase in income, the sharp rise of property price has to come from external demand. And these foreigners have extra money, a lot of it, which Singaporeans will find very hard to fight against them.

 

Since property price increases are foreign driven, what can the government do to protect Singaporean’s dream of owning a house or flat

?  And what can normal Singaporeans prepare for the money competition?

 

The cause: Property price increases are foreign driven.

 

In a Dow Jones article ‘Singapore Prime Minister: Global Monetary Conditions Are Abnormal’, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that current global monetary conditions were abnormal with excess liquidity in the system finding its way to emerging markets.

"Money is running around and looking for investment," He also said that these capital inflows that are finding their way into emerging markets were resulting in property and asset price increases, including that in China and Hong Kong.

"Singapore has seen it (property price increases) too. The market has seen a drastic increase in the last two years to our concern," Lee said. (Dow Jones)

PM Lee has admitted there is a foreign and local money competition in Singapore property market. So, his solution is to increase the property supply to meet the demand.

The solution: Worrying, alerting and supplying

‘Why Khaw is worried …..’ is the headline of a Today report.  The report said the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) announced a strong supply under the Government Land Sales Programme for the second half of this year. Mr Khaw Boon Wan, however shared his worries in his blog that "things can go very wrong suddenly", possibly over the next two years.

This, even as the authorities now tackle the issue of housing affordability. But Mr Khaw not only noted that "sharp property price increases cannot go on forever", he cautioned that mishaps could befall those seeking to invest or upgrade in the months ahead.
The external situation is "not exactly bullish" either. He said Europe's sovereign debt woes will take a long time to clear, and the Middle East crisis "can still go ugly", which may lead to a spike in oil prices and affect economic recovery in Asia and Singapore.

Disclosing that foreigners comprised 16 per cent of private property buyers between January and March, Mr Khaw had this message for Singaporeans who buy properties in the hope of renting to those coming here: "In the event of any external shock, both foreign demand and rental demand can fall quite quickly. The impact can be serious if (it) happens at a time when there's a substantial increase in supply."

His final caution was that interest rates will not remain low forever.

"It is my duty to sound an alert," said Mr Khaw. (Today)

Money making Model

Both PM Lee and Minister Khaw confirmed our property price is linked to foreign money when there is an inflow, price will go up (Lee’s view – abnormal excess liquidity) and when there is an outflow, price will go down(Khaw’s view - external shock).

In such a case, how to provide affordable housing to citizens under free foreign money inflow and outflow policy?  PAP Model of making money is to increase Supply and leaving Demand intact.  There is no mention of affordable housing means selling them at a lower price and so the more they sell the more money they make, even for public housing.

Singapore is a small economy and the West has excess cash and money finding means to park in Asia and Singapore. The size of this foreign money is many times of our property market, so the demand is always greater than supply. Hence, the price increases.  When price increases, government profit will increase too. This increase will also help to maintain affordable public housing at a higher level.

This is similar to foreign labour and talent policy. They just allow foreign labour and talents to come in as far as there is a foreign and local demand.   They like to use Supply Side theory to solve problems because they can make more money by giving more work permits, passes, PRs and even citizenships.

Local population and citizens will have to face the competition, in job, wages, and opportunity. So do the property market with foreign money.

Dream and Hope for upgrade

‘Tough time for S’pore upgraders’, The Star reported.   (http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/15/business/8899173&sec=business)
It said the price gap between mass market private homes and Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats has widened to a new record making it harder than ever for aspiring HDB upgraders to buy a private home.
You think of upgrade with you fixed income and salary. However, the foreign money that is going to buy private property in Singapore is using extra cash to compete with you. A little bit like you are going to a casino and even they upgrade you to VIP you are going to run out of cash one day.

Protection of citizens

I do not have the answer - whether increase supply and control demand will result to a better solution.  But as a government, the first duty to protect the interest of its citizens as foreign money, like foreign labour ad talents are transit passengers of our city hotels or hostels.

However, for people want to invest, speculate, and upgrade on their properties, it is worth taking note of Khaw’s warning and alert. At the end of the day, if there is a crash in the market, PAP will say they have warned you before and are unable to help those buy property at high prices. This time it will be worst for property losers as there is no workfare, training or others to help to recap your losses. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...