Skip to main content

行动党的镜子: 反思全场起立欢送之恨,错在哪里?

行动党的镜子:
反思全场起立欢送之恨, 错在哪里?  


不久前,一位电视红星到东陵一间餐馆用餐,遇上了一件非常不如意的事。红星只是要一杯热水,却受到餐馆招待的冷落,为难,最后,不得不一气之下,离开餐馆。但是,最令人愤愤不平的是这一幕:

餐馆全体招待,包括经理在内,一起欢送这位红星和她的男朋友离开餐馆,并且还鼓掌欢送他们出去。

新加坡一向奉行‘有钱最大’,怎么一下子,会变成有钱不赚。而且,还‘恨’客人恨到鼓掌欢送的地步。

事情有这巧,就这么巧,过不了多久,天降大雨,水淹该餐馆,处罚他们这么不爱钱的作风,罚他们加班,清理餐馆。

每日三省 为何恨我

深一层的想想,为何要这么恨一个人。而且,还让人当从出洋相,尤其是在洋人面前出洋相。我们是否有必要自身每日三省吾身,到底恨在哪里,为什么要这样恨我?

这使人想起,行动党过去50年来,做得这么好,国家上轨道,经济飞扬,世界上百万富豪排名第一,人人,尤其是外国人,都说好。 为什么,偏偏40%新加坡人说不好,狠狠的投下这恨恨的一票。为何?公理何在?

新加坡人是否是身在福中不知福?同样问题,好像阿扁也问过。还记得他的名言吗?

“难道阿扁错了吗?”

是的,阿扁身为台湾之子,政党轮替第一人,以赤贫出身,台大法律系第一名,是一个活生生的奋斗成功的例子,可以说是好多好多人的楷模,为何最终沦为台湾之耻。阿扁不明白,还是要问,难道阿扁错了吗?

回头想一想,行动党虽然有错,但是,应该不至于让人民恨到这个地步。是不是,我们自己心里不平衡,没事找事烦,自找烦恼。

自我反省,反思 - 错在哪里?

儒家告诉我们要反省,希望红星能够反省一下,为何他们那样对我,恨我,错在哪里?我了解他们的文化吗? 听说该餐馆大部分员工都是菲律宾人,一是离乡背井来新加坡工作,一是他们是不喜欢喝热水的民族,再来,可能是钱的问题。

换一个位子,如果你是餐馆的员工,你的想法是什么?你是不是也和他们一样,鼓掌欢送客人出门。

或许,你会说不对。这里是新加坡,他们要以新加坡的态度对待客人,我有钱,我最大,我要热水,他们就要提供。大不了,我给钱就是了。对不起,这回偏偏遇到一间不认钱的餐馆。

以对方立场来做事,推政策

行动党是否应该反省一下,做事,推政策,实施条例的时候,有没有考虑到人民的感受。政府的政策和条例,人民就是要听,要接受,不然,就用钱来压你,罚你。久而久之,恨根由此而起。

当我们引进外来人才,外劳,女佣的时候,我们是一厢情愿的认为他们一定要融入我们的社会,我们的习俗,我们的语言,但是,我们真的做得到吗?

女佣连考三次英文不及格,结果自寻短见。错的真的是女佣吗?我们反省一下,我们的条例和政策,是否是导致悲剧发生的前因。

女佣尸体藏在水槽,真的是男欢女爱的八卦的外国人的事情吗?

早报有位读者,还担心将来新加坡的中文世界将会后续无本土新加坡人,这个担心有一定的道理。错又在谁呢?

越往上爬,越要心灵建设

新加坡现在有这么多外国人,我们的社会机器跟得上吗?不只是硬件上要跟得上,软件就更要跟上。 偏偏我们最弱的就是文化建设,心件的建设,心灵的协助,而我们最强的是经济,以数据,以钱来衡量一切。

当我们要成为优雅社会,要成为第一世界国家的时候,我们真的要停下脚步,反省,反思,我们错在哪里?为何行动党这么可恨?我们的心可否以对方的心做出发,从他的立场来看问题,看出个恨,看出个错来。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...