Skip to main content

Lessons from Dreamliner PAP is playing with fire

The dream of 787 Dreamliners does not appear sweet despite having the best aircraft engineers in the world and long experience in plane making.  Why?  It fails to anticipate the fire problem – the li-ion battery.

The burned auxiliary power unit battery from a JAL Boeing 787 that caught fire on Jan. 7 at Boston's Logan International Airport soruce: Businessweek.com
The way the PAP runs the economy is like the 787 Dreamliner without considering the fire problem. In order to save cost and boost the economy, we allow the population to increase with no control. In order to be the new Switzerland, we allow our financial and legal system to be used by foreigners for their secret missions.

Boeing is not an ordinary company and its management, technology and many other aspects are all world class.  And yet, they fail to notice the fire problem.  Or is it because of competition and cost savings (fuels, efficiency), they rush to produce a Dreamliner with safety problem? 
[The first thing to know about lithium-ion batteries (li-ion batteries, for short) is that lithium is extremely flammable. The other thing to know is that li-ion batteries carry much more energy per weight than any other battery; in technical parlance, they have a higher energy density. That’s why they’re the battery of choice in everything from iPhones to laptops to electric cars, whose designers want to get the greatest potential power out of the smallest, lightest power source. In the Dreamliner, the use of li-ion batteries was part of what made the plane so much lighter—and therefore more fuel-efficient than its predecessors.]
 http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-01-18/why-the-batteries-in-boeings-787-are-burning 
If we look at the PAP policies, we will see some familiar things here: to save labour cost, we just import foreign labour; to increase price of HDB flats, we cut down supply and add more premium features (really?);   no baby, import foreigners; …

The worst things are to be more efficient like the Dreamliner, the PAP government encourages old and sick to move out of Singapore; refuses to reduce class size and to increase university places;  crowded public hospitals, clinics and transport system…..

These are to make Singapore lighter and so like the Dreamliner Singapore under the PAP administration can fly longer and higher with lesser fuel consumptions (caring of the needy).  Yes, without the poor, sick, old, less educated and low income Singaporeans, the PAP piloted Dreamliner can fly to another higher level of richness.

Unfortunately, in the commercial world, even Boeing must place the safety of passengers first.  No airports will allow a Dreamliner to land and take-off with a known firing problem. No matter how smart you are or how much risk you want to take, you cannot ignore the people’s safety or voters’ demand.

When the PAP decides to use ‘li-ion battery’ type of policies into Singapore economy, like Boeing they only look at the efficiency, cost savings, productivity and sad to say, they fail to see the fire in the money making process of a high GNP growth.

Like Boeing, the PAP-run Singapore Inc. is a world class institution.  If Boeing fails to see the battery fire, so do the PAP fails to see the rich-poor problem in Singapore.  

In another follow-up article on Dreamliners, there is another consideration that Singaporeans need to pay attention to. We certainly have to avoid the situation like ANA and JAL:   

[NEARLY a decade ago All Nippon Airways (ANA) brushed aside doubts about Boeing’s as-yet unbuilt 787 “Dreamliner” and placed the biggest launch order for a new jet in the planemaker’s history: 50 aircraft. Today, Japan is the world’s largest market for the 787. ANA and its domestic rival Japan Airlines (JAL) between them fly half of the 49 Dreamliners in service. As they have now discovered, that makes them the guinea-pigs in a complex aviation experiment.] 
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21569746-what-dreamliners-troubles-mean-airlines-and-other-planemakers-bad-dreams-all-round 
ANA and JAL are both the victims of the troubled Dreamliners. We, too, can be the guinea-pigs of the PAP Dreamliner. We are putting all our hopes and confidence in the PAP policies and institutions.  And at the end of the day, we may then find out it is due to the certification process (see below).  Voters in Singapore like FAA and others finally realize we have failed to examine properly the safety of an aircraft:  

[There is some risk that the detailed review of the 787’s safety launched by America’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) turns into an examination of the way the FAA and its equivalents worldwide go about certifying new planes. If so, and if there is any suggestion that the regulators should have required more tests before letting the 787 fly, then all the other new airliners now being worked on—Japanese, Canadian, Chinese, Russian and Brazilian as well as American and French ones—may take longer to get airborne.] 
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21569746-what-dreamliners-troubles-mean-airlines-and-other-planemakers-bad-dreams-all-round

In the past 50 years, we have failed to examine the PAP policies and institutions. We just give them the safety certificate as they wish.  Only perhaps until GE2011 and PE2011, Singaporeans begin to take a closer look at the fire problem of the PAP policies, like the Population White Paper.

The PAP is not so stupid.  A further safety examination of PAP Dreamliner by voters will result to less PAP MPs being elected. So, you see the call of ‘PAP NCMPs being appointed as ministers’.  They know they will lose more GRCs, and more sitting ministers like the case of Aljunied GRC, so they come out anther safety procedure for themselves.  In case they do not have enough elected MPs for minister positions, they can co-opt NCMPs as ones!

This is really kiasu plus kiasi!

Voters in Singapore must look at the real danger – the battery fire of the PAP Dreamliner, and give a thorough check before issuing them a certificate to run the country again.  If they fail the safety test, we must have the courage to ground the PAP Dreamliner and let another plane to take off. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting

因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。

  因为有比较, 才知道做得不够, 才明白什么叫做易通。 如果只有一套解决方法,很难看出好坏,方便还是不方便,易通还是不容易通。用新方法代替旧的系统,人们当然会做比较,尤其是科技产品,使用的人很多,一用就马上看到结果。 这是一个竞争的世界,即使一党独大,也要考虑到便民。当人民觉得不方便,不好用,不易通,就会反映,发声,不满。为什么没有预先想到,最可怕的是测试时,已经接到反应,还是不加改善。或许,行动党还抱着“令伯”最大,用者自行解决问题。 易通公交收费系统的整合,似乎缺少一种人文,沟通,反而更加多表现出政府的独断独行。尤其重要的是,如果只有一套系统,我们是看不出问题,做不出好坏的评价。 这其实证明国会里不可以只有一把声音,没有比较,没有进步。

After 60 years, after 3 failed political imaginations, the PAP is deteriorating...