Skip to main content

Butterfly or Frog: GIC return in US$?

If you are buying shares of a local listed company, e.g. DBS or SIA, do you expect to receive dividend or performance forecast in US$? So, why are you receiving GIC financial information in US$?     
SIA, DBS, CapitaLand, Sembcorp, Hyflux, and other listed companies have investments and income from overseas.  Do you accept their annual reports in US$?  And they give you dividends in US$.  The answer is No.

Local investors will be very confused if Singapore companies give their sales forecast and business performance in non-Singapore dollars.  It is like a Singapore investor buying USA or European shares or bonds without considering the foreign exchange risks. Or, maybe the Government Investment Corporation of Singapore is doing the same and so we have the following news: 
[GIC reports use nominal return in US dollars to avoid confusion: Josephine Teo]http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/gic-reports-use-nominal-return-us-dollars-avoid-confusion-josephine-te
Reporting GIC performance in US$ is what kind of behaviour? - Butterfly or Frog#1. To the PAP government, it is a butterfly so that they can show you our reserve in US$ - an international currency flying here and there all over the world. And to the stakeholders or the general public, the PAP is treating them like a frog. Frog lives in a well and knows nothing about the outside world.

So, the PAP pretends to present a GIC butterfly to the public and assume the public are frogs and they don’t know about the operations of international finance. 

Coincidently, the citizens also think the PAP is behaving like a beautiful butterfly but they are not frogs as they want to find out the true colour of the butterfly. The PAP tries very hard to present a US$ butterfly.  However, we want to see the butterfly in S$.  Is this so difficult? Yes, according to a PAP MOS: [Minister of State for Finance Josephine Teo explained that the GIC stopped publishing its nominal returns expressed in Singapore dollars three years ago, to avoid confusion when comparisons are made with other fund managers or global indices.]

The PAP is afraid of confusions or comparisons. Our GIC in US$ is a confusion to Singaporeans. We don’t even know our reserve performance in our own currency!  This is really uniquely Singapore. Perhaps, in US$, the GIC butterfly shows its beautiful side and in S$ it is another colour- a colour that the PAP government finds it hard to present. Why do comparisons bring confusion when the PAP government has all the fact to present?

Perhaps, our butterfly when compares with other international fund managers or sovereign wealth funds is just a little red dot – not that colourful and beautiful.

According to Professor Kishore Mahbubani, happy butterfly seems to be objective and unhappy frog tends to be subjective. #1 
   
However, the GIC presentation in US$ is really not objective at all.   It is confusion and is afraid of international comparisons. No wonder, the PAP has to think negatively about Singaporeans and assume citizens are frogs – thinking subjectively and always unhappy about the presentation of our reserve.

Think about it if you are investors, employees or civil servants, you will only get to know the company performance in US$ (and paid in US$), not in S$, do you want to invest or work for this company?

If we accept this type of argument (return in US$), then we are really the boiling frogs or well frogs.  Boiling frogs mean we don’t know our reserve performance at all and its risk level without check and balance.  Well frogs mean we don’t care about the reserve and let the PAP decide without transparency and accountability.     

This argument may also lead to future reporting in other currency, e.g. euro, Chinese Yuan.  Since the PAP assumes we agree with the US$ reporting, they may even come out with multi-currency reporting depending on which butterfly is most suitable and presentable.


#1
[Singaporean society could either emerge as a happy butterfly, flitting around in a garden city, or it could emerge as a lonely frog, croaking away unhappily in a little well.

Objectively, the odds should favour a happy outcome. Subjectively, we seem to be headed for an unhappy outcome.]
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/singapore-butterfly-or-frog-20130309

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more