Skip to main content

The new normal of sex, corruption, and fund misuses …. Rather than a political new norm


We all expect a new political normal after 2011 watershed election, but wait a minute, we have something more interesting.  Politics is always a ‘slow hot’ item in Singapore, so we better let the human nature take the first place.  Politics can wait, but human desires can’t wait for too long, especially when comes to money and women.  

However, we don’t see any new changes in politics, even with the Hougang by-election, the PAP continues running the country as their wishes as before – no openness and transparency in CPF, reserve, Temasek and GIC.  The ruling party still has overwhelming majority in the parliament. If they want, they can pass any bills into law.  

We are misled to believe there is a new political normal. The reality is the new normal comes from non-political developments.  This fits the development of Singapore – economics comes first, social changes, politics come later.     

The temptation for money and sex is always there; especially it is easy money and easy sex.  Singapore is no exception.  Perhaps, we have hidden our desires for too long and now out of sudden, the new normal is all these appear one after the other. 

We are too proud to have economic success for more than 50 years. We are also proud to have a clean image – less corruption, less paid sex related crimes, misuses of trusted fund.  And in addition, we consider we are a conservative society for sex, corruption and crimes. Perhaps, this is why we still maintain the death penalty.

So, instead of a new political norm – space for political participation and inclusiveness, we are experiencing an unusual high number of high profile cases of sex for favour or contract corruption, sex with underage girls, criminal breach of trust or misuses of fund etc.   Strange!  Why all these come only after 2011 and replace the politics as the main leads in our daily life.

The Singapore society now experiences a new normal, from a clean image to a reality show in life – corruption, sex, and fund misuses.  We are no difference from others. We are after all human beings.  Unfortunately, we are still at the very low level of Marlow’s hierarchy of needs – just look for the basic needs, not the spiritual needs.   



We are now down from the high ethical point to a level that is common in other countries, i.e. what happens to other countries also happen to us despite the prevention measures like high salary, quick promotion, CPIB, CAD etc.  The good, bad and ugly of people’s behavior and human nature in other countries are also happening here in Singapore.

It is interesting to note that we are able to maintain a clean image for 50 years but why we can’t continue to do so for another 50 years. We don’t have so many scandals before is it because (or maybe) we are too smart to hide our secrets or we have all the while under report these scandals in the past?

So, is this is a new normal or an old normal?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...