Skip to main content

Three Views on Reserves: Political, Investment, and Entrepreneurship

 Three Views on Reserves:

Political, Investment, and Entrepreneurship


Three potential candidates provide three views on our reserves.  The first one needs no explanation.  It is a status quo, like the 3 past so-called elected presidents.


The second one is interesting. From an investment viewpoint, we seek maximum returns with calculated risks.  We want to see good and capable people in competition, using their best talents to provide the best goods and services.  Best companies fight among themselves, however, investors choose the winners and put money on them.


The third one is enterprising. A market of imperfect competition, free to go, free to join, regardless of big or small.  Entrepreneurs take risks by starting new businesses. However, the risk is high and most of them fail.     


Singapore political culture prefers the first two views. We want billionaires to come as the government says they can create jobs. As a financial centre, we provide facilities to help them make more profits and we receive fees or commissions.


We are not used to entrepreneurship.  We are not trained to take risks but helping others to minimise risk and maximise profits. High rent and high cost are bad for enterprises but have little impact on private offices.   


Local enterprises have their roots here. They cannot move away easily. They take risks here, grow the companies here. And yet, we don’t appreciate and value them.  


From the British colony to independence, our growth model is either administrative run, government-led investments or service provider. We are independent but not yet independent in entrepreneurship or enterprising.  


Will the coming presidential election make a difference? Moving away from political views and taking some risks in investment or enterprise.    

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more