Skip to main content

1%的黑白屋规划烦恼 演变成全国性诚信危机?

 1%的黑白屋规划烦恼

演变成全国性诚信危机?


一个说财务规划,要卖房子。另一个说为了创造一个大家庭的环境。因此,租用黑白屋成为一个选项。

在新加坡能够做这样的生活规划,很可能只是1%的人。这些人不是富就是贵,不是一般人可以想象的。

还有,不要整天想买房,租房、租黑白屋也是一个选项。一般人认为买不起房子的人才租房,现在,这可是看走了眼。1%的脑子和我们大多数人不一样,因此,规划起来也与众不同。

上层1%人的规划,其实不关其他人的事,一般人也很难有条件做这样的选项。尤其是住和租99年组屋的居民,他们关心生活费,就业,孩子教育,医药和公共交通问题。哪里还有时间做这样的理财和租屋规划。

这个原本属于1%人的烦恼,竟然演变成政治诚信危机,应该是一场意外,也凸显人民行动党的政治敏感度,跟不上潮流、时代变化。早知如此,就早早修法,改制度,杜绝诚信被质疑。

公共服务署将推出一套申报标准要求,似乎变成马后炮,没有预先觉察危机的本能。当然,自信心过高,国会绝对优势,鼓吹自我检讨的伟大,也让这个政府觉得大事可以化小,小事化无。

花了一整天,在国会辩论这个1%人的诚信问题,是不是浪费纳税人的钱?政府当然说不是,因为这涉及部长,涉及政府的诚信,因此,必须严肃对待。事情因你而起,人民却要买单。

这一轮辩论下来,信的人多,还是,怀疑的人多,还是,一半一半,半信半疑。因为,这是1%的人的财务生活规划,大多数人不容易理解,甚至,都没有看过黑白屋。对不对?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...