Skip to main content

失落,焦虑,无所适从,。。。 PAP支持者努力找回往日的 光辉、信任、初心?

 失落,焦虑,无所适从,。。。

PAP支持者努力找回往日的

光辉、信任、初心?


人民行动党让支持者无所适从。他们失去方向,漫无目的的寻找可以安抚、可以发泄的地方。他们甚至把怒火发泄在反对党身上,把自己的错误怪罪于他人。


语无伦次,失态,失落,焦虑,其实正反映了行动党领导在沟通,危机处理,应变能力方面出现很多、很大问题。支持者没有获得足够的信息, 当然就无法配合演出。


时不我与, 怪谁?


一向信任的党,突然变得很陌生,今天的行动党不是以前的行动党。支持者的失落、失魂、不知所措,可想而知。支持者发现初心不在,信任可疑,焦虑又担心行动党如何走下去?


即使想帮忙,也无所适从,不知如何下手,因为只能向其他人一样,看电视报纸。然而,这种管道已经越来越起不了作用和沟通效率。行动党支持者的心理变化,外人很难理解,精神领袖不在,党内难念的经,又不止一本,而是好几本。


(就像巫统和国民党的忠实支持者那样,看到巫统和国民党发展到现在这个阶段,他们的失落感,急切寻找党魂,不知所措,如何才可以听到正确的指引,找回失去的初心,重新信任党和安慰焦虑的心。行动党最后的安慰,很可能是到目前为止,还没有明显的内乱。或许有,我们也不知道,只是还没有表面化罢了。)


人民行动党的支持者,尤其是忠实的老支持者,对于党发展到今天,一定忧心重重。 几十年的精神支柱,一下子变得信心动摇,焦虑,帮不上忙,甚至,无所适从,不知所措。


支持者没有了方向,党又选择性的提供和一般人一样的信息,甚至误导、片面、一知半解、画蛇添足

、不知所云的解释,对于支持者来说,这是不足够的。久而久之,他们也开始怀疑党,透明度不够,以救国为名,实际上,就是救党,维护既得利益者。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...