Skip to main content

改朝换代国未灭 亡党未必真亡国


‘反对腐败、建设廉洁政治,是党一贯坚持的鲜明政治立场,是人民关注的重大政治问题。这个问题解决不好,就会对党造成致命伤害,甚至亡党亡国。’-    中国国家主席胡锦涛在中共十八大报告中强调反腐

中国经历了几千的历史,是否曾经亡国?元朝,清朝虽然不是汉族,但是,仍然是中华民族的一部分,仍然是中华儿女,仍然是中国人。因此,中国这几千年来,只有朝代的兴亡,这就好像它的历史,文化一样,没有中断过,而只有高低潮。

因此,胡锦涛的亡党亡国论,应该一分为二。党国应该要分开,党就像朝代一样,兴起灭亡,被他人取代,是正常现象。而中国做为一个主体,千百年来并没有亡国,依然存在,有些人革命成功,有些人革命失败罢了。

党国不分的悲哀

新加坡虽然作为一个岛国,小国,历史也短,人也不多。但是,我们仍有必要分清楚党国的不同。共产党在中国,行动党在新加坡,为何一定要党国不分呢?没有了党,国家是否一定要灭亡呢?没有汉唐盛世,中国依然存在。除非汉唐等同中国,那么汉唐没有了,中国也就没有了。这点相信支持共产党的人也未必同意。

当然,支持行动党的人,也应该会同意,没有了行动党,新加坡还是要继续走下去,不会灭亡。

担心没有了共产党,中国怎么办?担心没有了行动党,新加坡怎么办?那么你问前人,没有了唐宋元明清,以前的中国人怎么办?没有了英国统治者,没有了马来西亚,老一辈新加坡人怎么办?他们不也是这样一步一步的走过来,走过去,见证历史。

所以,党国要分清楚,前路才是光明的。共产党如果克服不了腐败,中国就真的要灭亡吗?行动党解决不了新加坡的贫富问题,社会问题,难道我们就要走向衰败,走向灭亡吗?这不是太小看中国人,新加坡人了吗?

秦汉,隋唐的关系

汉朝继续秦朝的制度,并加以改进。唐朝承续隋朝的条例,并加以改良。秦朝和隋朝的命运虽然短暂,但是却为汉唐的盛世打开了新的局面,奠定良好基础。

清朝结束后,中国陷入军阀混乱,国民党虽然取得中国的短暂政权。但是,1949年后,这个国民党在中国大陆真的可以说是亡党了,取而代之的是共产党。但是,中国并没有灭亡,从中国军阀,中国国民党,再到中国共产党,不管怎么变,还是中国,中华大地。

将来呢?谁也说不准。说不定,又再来多一个什么中国XXX党,中国YYY党的上来当家做主。谁又能说的准,中国国民党,中国共产党的命运,就像秦朝,隋朝一样,是为一个强大繁荣的新中国而做好基础,铺平道路。

这样看来,党国真的不能等同,党国需要分开,而其真正的意义就是亡党未必真的亡国。最坏的例子可能是苏维埃,党国都没有了,分裂了。但是,作为主体的俄罗斯仍在,影响力仍然不容忽视。

新加坡当然不可能分裂成为几个国家。如果真的的是亡党亡国,那就只有和邻国合并了。

中国钱涌向美国,会不会导致美国思想倒流回中国?#1

外部影响会有多大?

新加坡,中国早就不是封闭锁国,尤其是经济方面,更是经济开放的急先锋。我们的消费文化,深深的受到欧美的影响,我们爱苹果,爱法拉利,爱LV。。。。当然,从经济延伸到环保,社会课题,自由,民主。外来的和尚似乎比较会念经,影响力肯定会有,但是,到底有多深呢?

这些外部影响,在社交媒体,脸书,微博,的牵动下,很快的就把讯息传给人们。人们又是如何消化这些讯息呢!年轻人又是如何拥抱这些外来影响?当他们听到越来越多欧巴马和其他欧美政治人物的演讲后,又是否会反问自己,为何不能和外国一样,有着民主,自由投票的权利。

欧巴马刚刚当选连任美国总统,新加坡和中国的当政者,在听到看到国人对欧巴马胜选演讲的内容后,除了恭贺欧巴马当选外,心理上会不会更加害怕人们要求欧巴马所高唱的民主和自由:

以下是欧巴马胜选演讲中的两段语录:
'民主的情绪可能十分复杂,可能十分混乱,每个人可能都有自己的观点,每个人都有自己深深的信仰,在我们经历艰难时刻,做出艰难抉择时,我们很自然会有冲突,会有情感的表达,但是我认为它不应当影响我们今晚的表现。这些争论正是我们自由的基础,我们永远不会忘记我们说话的时候,许多国家的人民仍然在冒着风险,希望能够找到解决问题的方法,希望能够争取投票的权利。' -----
'美国是全球拥有最多财富的国家,但这并不是美国人民富有的真正原因。我们拥有最强大的军队,但这并不是我们强壮的真正原因。我们拥有最优秀的高等教育和文化成果,但这并不是吸引世界各国人民涌向美国的真正原因。美国之所以与众不同,是因为能够包容多元化的纽带将我们联系在一起,是因为我们相信彼此拥有共同的命运,是因为我们相信,只有为他人付出,互相帮助才能实现国家的进步,才能为后代创造更美好的未来。前人曾为自由奋斗甚至是献出生命,而只有负责任与权利的结合,只有爱、宽容、责任感及爱国之情能使我们更好地实现、维护这份来之不易的自由。这才是美国的伟大之处。'
http://news.ifeng.com/world/special/usa2012/content-3/detail_2012_11/07/18926762_0.shtml


#1
这张相片的原文说明是中国钱无论如何将涌向美国。
Chinese money is likely to find its way to the US one way or another. (Photo/CNS)
http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20121107000125&cid=1101 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...