Skip to main content

Singapore working language is English? (Part 2) - 10-12% of Singapore population are Chinese immigrants.



In the past 20 years, nearly 600,000 Chinese immigrants arrive in Singapore.  This is bigger than the population of Ang Mo Kio and Toa Payoh put together.  Of course, it is also bigger than the population of Brunei.

A study report from China’s Xiamen University Nanyang Studies Institute also estimates that it is 10-12% of our total population. 
(学者研究称近二十年新加坡的中国新移民约60


The Dean of the Institute, Prof. Zhuang Guo Tu, in a forum in Shanghai pointed out that since 1990, after the establishment of Sino-Singapore diplomatic relationship; Chinese immigrants have arrived in Singapore in great number. From the 10-year period of 1990-2000, the number of Chinese immigrants is more than 230,000. From 2001 to 2009, the number is at least 300,000.   

According to Zhuang, there are 4 types of Chinese immigrants in Singapore: professionals and students, ordinary skill workers, investors and labourers.  In addition, there are also immigrants through marriage, illegal means and self-employed persons.  

If we based on the 2007 blue plan of Singapore’s population in 2030, the total population will reach 6.5 million.  To obtain this number, in views of the low birth rate and to maintain 75% Chinese population in Singapore, by 2030, Singapore will need to import 1.2 million Chinese race immigrants.
Of course, not all of them are from China. 

Zhuang also gave another figure: In the past 30 years, Singapore has a net immigrant number of 1.64 million. Most of them are Chinese from Malaysia and China. Perhaps, this explains why our population increases to more than 5 million.

The above figures show that we need to live with a large number of Chinese and other immigrants now and in future. And their working languages may not necessarily be in English.  For the next generation of Singaporeans, it is always beneficial to know another working language, in addition to the common English language.   Otherwise, you may have to restrict your movements, activities and selection of friends in Singapore.

It will also help to maintain better social and racial relationship by knowing another language.  The future of Singapore is quite different from now, especially very different from the 1980s. We need to face the reality of immigrants and their working languages. And in future, even there is a change of government; it will be hard to turn around the clock.  The most the new government can do is to slower down the process of immigration as what the PAP is doing it now (not sure?). 

The Shanghai forum also discloses that there are about 50 million overseas Chinese.  In the beginning of 20th century, there were 4 to 5 million overseas Chinese.  It increased to 12-13 million in the early 1950s and 90% of them were in Southeast Asia. By 2007-2008, there were 45.43 million overseas Chinese.  However, the percentage in Southeast Asia had gone down to about 73%. The bigger increases are in North America, Europe, Australia, Japan and South Korea etc.
(5000万:华侨华人总数首次得出较明确统计数字

Judging from the speed of increase, there will be more and more overseas Chinese.  Whether they are from Hong Kong, Taiwan, China and even Malaysia, their mother tongue is not English except Singapore

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...