Skip to main content

The Awakening of English Educated Elite and the Calling of Tan Cheng Bock??? Perhaps.


Dr Tan Cheng Bock believes the PAP government decision on PE 2017 will affect the outcome of the next General Election. Dr. Tan also indicates his intention to train potential good members of parliament.

Is he saying the People’s Action Party will lose more seats in time to come? And the current MPs, including NMPs and NCMPs, are not up to standard. Perhaps, both are valid statements.

Is this a game changer for politics in Singapore?

To make the statements valid, there will be a need of a true awakening of English educated elite answering to Dr Tan’s calling. Judging from the more than 150 people turning up to listen to Dr Tan, how do we make assessment whether there is an awakening and self conscience?

[No more Chinese educated elite]
When I attended Chinese schools many years ago, about one-thirds of Singapore students were in Chinese schools. Since then the enrolment declined till zero and now there is no more Chinese schools in Singapore.

So, what we have now are English schools and English educated elite. From education diversification point of view, we become more mono-lingua, more English centric and less understanding of our mother tongues even we claimed the success of bilingualism.

Naturally, this development also produces English educated politicians who are quite different from first or second generation leaders.

By and large, the Chinese-English school issue also divides job opportunities, education chances, and salary between Chinese and English educated students, giving advantages to the later.

“I still remember, he said, “First-class university in UK, you know Cambridge, and Oxford. University of Singapore is second-class. Nanyang University is third-class.” We all felt humiliated. We knew that we were not third-class, but because we were educated in Chinese, we would not be able to articulate fluently in English, and thereby unable to communicate the ideas that we had.”

https://mothership.sg/2017/10/new-interviews-with-wp-leaders-low-thia-khiang-sylvia-lim-reveal-previously-untold-stories/

[English educated elite and future Singapore]
This is an era when there is no more Chinese educated elite, after the closing of Nanyang University in 1980. The self-proclaimed 4th generation leaders do not have the personal experience of how Chinese educated Singaporeans were treated even though their older friends or relatives sometimes sharing their experience with them.

How will they lead Singapore, especially in difficult time?

Look at the mis-steps or up-down relationship with China, will advice from Chinese educated elite make a difference?

Do we expect a Chinese educated scholar in history saying thing like ‘I am getting 5 years older because I serve voluntarily in a difficult department or ministry’? Or my salary is too low to justify my high position. Most likely, we will see Ong Teng Cheong type of people doing the right thing at the right time in history.

Is this contributing to a missing link between Singaporeans and the PAP?

[English educated elite or foreign talents]
Under the PAP, there is clearly a ‘talents no enough’, besides ‘money no enough’. So, we need foreign talents as well as foreign talents turned politicians.

How well will they response to the Singapore environment and continue to promote Singapore or Singaporeans first?

[Awakening or response to calling]
Perhaps, Dr Tan is too optimistic and anticipates changes in the next GE. Yes or no?

One thing is for sure. The stage for Chinese educated elite or talents is over. Even our Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong who studied at Catholic High, as he claimed, is going to hand over his power after the next GE.

Can an awakening arise due to PM Lee’s stepping down or a self conscience of English educated elite? This elite see the need to serve Singapore, protect Singaporean interest, in an alternative way or joining the opposition by taking a difficult path.

After enjoying good life, is it time for English educated elite to come forward and serve Singapore? And of course, by doing so, they answer to Dr Tan’s calling for a change.

{"Singaporeans felt they were deprived of their democratic right to vote for a president of their choice," said the former PAP MP of 26 years, who lost the 2011 presidential election by a razor-thin margin.


"How you capitalise on this is a task for any politician wanting to see a change. And a change can only come if the electorate sends a strong signal by voting for more alternative MPs in Parliament."


Dr Tan repeatedly urged Singaporeans to step forward and help bring about change at the forum, which was part of the Future of Singapore series curated by veteran urban planner Tay Kheng Soon.}


http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/pe2017-will-affect-voting-at-next-ge-tan-cheng-bock

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...