Skip to main content

行动党:自导自演 自作自受

行动党在国会内外自导自演,而国人却要分摊行动党自作自受的结局。



在新加坡,不论国会里,国会外,我们一直都看到行动党的自导自演。国会里,谁先发言,谁之后发言,都有一定的标准程序。少数反对党议员夹在中间,很难变出什么花招来的。国会外,更加不用说了,媒体的垄断,行政单位的垄断,反对党根本没有站的地方。


自导自演的贡献,根据行动党的说法,就是获得人民的强大委托。在务实和现实下,在沉迷于行动党的SG50画面下,选民不知不觉,就这样给予强大的委托。行动党可否在后SG50,继续自导自演,继续给新加坡人一个虚构的电影画面,而忽视务实的现状。


既然是自导自演,后果当然是,行动党也必须接受自作自受。电影没有人看,制作团队当然要自作自受。对于行动党来说,何解?为什么行动党千算万算,竟然还要面对‘自作自受’的结果。行动党定下的游戏规则,新加坡人人都要听从。这套游戏规则,原本就是要限制新加坡人,反对党人的一举一动。如果犯了游戏规则,就要被处罚。因此,这样的安排应该是:行动党‘自作,别人’他受‘,不是行动党’自作自受‘。

国会辩论非选区议员,工人党要求换人。在行动党看来,当然是破坏游戏规则。我们规定什么人出任非选区议员,就是该人出任。但是,游戏规则又规定最少9个反对党议员。总理还大声的说,将来还要增加到12人。行动党在不愿意的情形下,只能推出政治操纵轮,并且大力支持通过让工人党获得这个’换人‘要求。


当然,国会里,国会外,言论一面倒,就是工人党破坏游戏规则, 是’坏人‘,利用游戏规则的漏洞来达到目的。利用漏洞,务实的完成任务,不正是大多数新加坡人的心理反应吗?我们每天都想要合理依法的少交税,住C级,B级病房,申请政府组屋等等。工人党利用这个漏洞,就变成了政治操纵。而行动党却把自己的政治操纵当成理所当然,别人的务实行为,却是下流,肮脏的。


【行动党只谈过去和将来】


行动党大搞特搞SG50是一种过去荣光的自导自演。行动党大搞特搞后SG50(SG100)是一种未来幻想的自导自演。而现在,当下却很少提到。因为,这里出现了一个自作自受的问题。非选区议员就是一个问题。


当然,和民选总统的课题相比,这就变得’小巫见大巫‘。多一个,少一个非选区议员,对国会,对行动党,甚至工人党都不会出现大的变数。但是,民选总统,就直接影响到行动党的脑神经了。行动党害怕2011年总统选举版本的再现。


深一层想一想,这个害怕不正是自作自受吗?


当初,高举为新加坡好,为政治稳定好,而推出民选总统,非选区议员,官委议员和集选区制度。这些都是SG50的荣光,现在却要面对自作自受的困境。因此,行动党希望回顾过去,希望跳到未来的幻境。而不要处于现在,面对自作自受的结果。


【新加坡现在的问题】


这是行动党不愿意面对的。总理几个月前,国庆群从大会,大选,新年献词,不提经济数据。表面上说,要讲素质,不要一直讲钱。事实上,经济问题就是一个大问题。


最新的就业,生产数据都不好。国外的情形也不好。新加坡又是高消费,贫富不均的地方。行动党过去自导自演的这个良方,可以继续下去吗?行动党已经看到这个危机,因此,早早就进行大选。但是,总统选举却固定在8月,不能改期。不能改期,就改游戏规则吧!这是行动党自导自演的一贯做法。这次也没有例外。


行动党遇到了自作自受的困境,而务实的新加坡人,是否能够置身事外?不受到牵连?当然不可能。行动党的很多问题,现在面对自作自受的问题:移民政策,语文政策,教育政策,房地产政策,医药政策等等,都是全体新加坡人要面对的问题。行动党不会轻易放过国人,除非你很有钱,或许还能发一点国难财,因为,每一次出现危机,灾难,结果是富者越富。


我们除了看到行动党的自导自演,更加要了解行动党的自作自受,而作为普通新加坡人,我们也要分享和分摊行动党的自作自受,这是强大委托下的现实和务实反照。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...