Skip to main content

When our maids are richer than our poor …..



In this richest nation in the world, our low income needy families have to seek assistance from the government to employ a maid.  At the same time, our maids, with higher starting pay, will likely to have more savings than our low income families.       

Is this a happy dilemma? Is this an unavoidable dilemma?

Some may argue that our poor and low income families are luckier than their American counterparts.  These Americans have no subsidy at all, not to mention a maid grant.  So, in Singapore, the government does help the poor and low income families.  However, it also proves that it is very difficult to uplift the livelihood of lower 20% of the families in Singapore. Otherwise, a pragmatic PAP government, whose principle is against welfare state, will not adopt this last resort to help the needy families.

The government is now caught between the rich and the poor, successful and not successful persons, the Haves and the Have Nots.   They are balancing it and monitoring it with the hope that they can influence their votes in the next election.   

Here are the headlines:



It is not sure whether the government knows the maids will have higher salary in advance or not and the maid grants are just to cover the increase.  Earlier in the years, the Indonesian government had indicated their intention and some maid agents had implemented this already. So, the maid grants are only a cushion. Have the grants really solved the problems of needy families?   

The higher salary shows that the Indonesian government wants to protect their maids by imposing a higher minimum salary and off day compensation.  They are doing this for the welfare of their workers, however, in Singapore; we leave the market forces to decide the wages of our local workers even though their income cannot meet their end needs.  

We may complain and comment the Indonesian government is corrupt, inefficient, and slow in action.  However, in some ways, they are moving faster than us and possibly in the right direction.

We are the richest in the world, but certainly not our low income families.  As we say we must respect our maids with dignity, so do the poor and needy in Singapore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...