Skip to main content

Immigrations are necessary systems but not the masters


“In any complex environment systems are necessary, but they must serve an organization rather than become its masters.”  - Ralph S. Larsen

The debate on our population, immigrations and foreign talents is necessary but we should not let them become the masters of everything in Singapore. When immigration and population systems become ‘auto pilot’, become our masters, then we will not able to judge objectively and fairly.

The ‘auto pilot’ thinking is that without the inflow of foreigners, being talents or workers, Singapore will be gone and there is no future here.  This mindset has become the centerpiece of government policy and it has directed the decision of the country’s planning.

So, the immigration and population issues have become systems and without these systems Singapore government cannot think, cannot plan and cannot run the economy. These issues and systems have since hijacked the rational ‘people’s action’ thinking of the government.  However, systems are to serve the organization or in this case, a country – Singapore.  Just like the MRT system is to serve the people not a system of profit making.  Once a people system becomes profit making, its masters have changed from the people to the money.

Hence, immigrations and population as systems are to serve Singapore and not become the masters of Singapore.

If these necessary systems become masters, they will rule our life and our future.   When we look at “Our Population, Our Future”, it must be a system not a master.  When we share our views, concerns, and aspirations, Singaporeans must be always reminded that we are the masters of the population policies.
  
Unfortunately, the PAP government has willingly or unwillingly given up its master status, master thinking authority to the systems of immigration and population.

Anything we talk and comment bad about the systems is bad for immigrations and foreigners.  As a result, the government shifts off its thinking process and downgrades its master status.  It then lets the systems runs by themselves – to let the immigration and population issues lead the thinking and decide the future direction of Singapore.

Because the government lets the immigration becomes master and let it decides, so the end result is a policy good for foreigners and bad for locals.     

In term of public relations it is good PR outside Singapore and bad PR inside Singapore.
    
Outside PR Good inside PR Poor

The handling of immigration issues by Singapore government is like a rotten apple: look good outside and bad inside. 

Our immigration policy has received many praises from foreigners but creates controversy and criticisms among Singaporeans.  It has become the dividing force not a unity power.

If you ask why the government PR and communications are so poor domestically, then you will have to understand who the masters are. The masters are the systems of immigration and population. The government has lost its control to the systems so the systems decide the pro-foreigners policy.

And naturally, the systems will take on the good PR campaign and communications outside Singapore.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...