Win 100%, Lose 85.71%.
Who really wins in the case of a shophouse lawsuit?
A win is not a win. A loss is not a loss. There is no winner who takes all the benefits. When reading news, we need to compare and know the details. The headlines can be misleading.
In the case of ex-MP Chiang Hai Ding’s shophouse lawsuit, news reports may give you a confusing answer. If you read Today, the headline seems to suggest Chiang wins. The Straits Times gave another picture, winning the case may not necessarily be the final winner. Same for 8world and Zaobao.
The key is the benefit distribution of the shophouse. The win means the property 100% belongs to Chiang. However, due to contributions from Chiang’s son and daughter in law, 85.71% of the benefit belonged to his son. This has to be considered in the divorce proceeds between son and daughter in law.
100% win is really not a 100% win. For the loser, it is also not a 100% loss. In fact, 85.71% of the shophouse’s benefits is subject to divorce proceeds.
Is this a reflection of life? How to define who is the winner or loser?
Comments
Post a Comment