Skip to main content

Higher Risk, Lower Return, Insurance Companies Are Under insured? What About Our Payouts?

 Higher Risk, Lower Return, Insurance Companies Are Under insured? What About Our Payouts?


The recent announcement of four ‘too big to fail’ insurance companies in Singapore seems to suggest the insurance industry may face a difficult time ahead.  Most of our insurance money is invested in the West and managed by them and the highly possible downturn of their economies will result in higher risk and lower return.


Higher capital requirements and more controls over them may prevent these insurance companies from going down.  But with reduced income and benefits distribution, less payouts from insurance products are possible.  


With an increasing number of people, especially retirees, using insurance as annuity, or monthly payouts to supplement their CPF Life, if insurance companies cut their payouts, this will affect their ‘take home’ income.  For the same reason, the CPF Board can also use the same reason (higher risk, lower return) to reduce either interest rate or payouts to CPF members.  This is, perhaps, why the CPF Board is very reluctant to increase interest rates when banks are offering higher than 2.5% per year.    


The high inflation, high interest rate in the West will likely last longer than expected.  More bankruptcies and unemployment are expected there.   If our insurance products are highly concentrated in the West, higher risk and lower return are the natural outcome.  For example, in the past, the insurance companies were happy to provide 4.5% but with the expected lower returns, they will give the minimum return or 3% as required by the authority.  


In some ways, lower returns are still better than no returns or worse, the insurance companies go bankrupt due to external factors, outside Singapore. We may be able to prevent ‘too big to fail’ in Singapore.  But we cannot stop ‘too big to fail’ in the West.  Our risk exposures in the West cannot be prevented if we park your money there.  They manage their economies, their fund managers manage our money.  When the cake becomes smaller, our share is even smaller.    


Not only do we face an uncertain future, we also face more risks in our money management.  Not to mention cheats, scams!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more