Skip to main content

Views Of Losers Are Still Important: Good Opposition, Cost Of Living etc

 Views Of Losers Are Still Important:

Good Opposition, Cost Of Living etc


Majority of the voters voted for no surprise, status quo.  It is important that more attention should be given to the views of the losers.  Otherwise, we are living in the illusion that everyday is a good day and our strong reserves will ensure a good life and meet all future challenges. 


Good opposition makes good government.  Only 16% of voters view this as correct.  These voters also believe in competition.  Oh! cost of living, affordable housing and elderly care only received 14% support.  Are these really not an issue? Not important at all?


The winner can just ignore these callings. 70% said they did not want surprises, no improvement is needed.  Voting for a perfect man, all problems will be solved.  

Really?  

 

Wait a minute!  Respect for all means not only the 70%, the views of the 30% must also be equally respected.  Otherwise, how to unite the people, building a stronger Singapore Inc?   


For those who did not vote for Tharman, there is nothing to be disappointed about.  There is nothing to be regretted.  In fact, 30% are independent voters.  On the contrary, if the respect for all is true, then the 30% should be equally respected, no more no less.  Singapore, as a nation, must acknowledge and value the difference, different choice, the silent minority.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more