Skip to main content

Time is bad as seen in the Acknowledgement of Unemployed benefits, Inequality and Mobility.

 Time is bad as seen in the Acknowledgement of Unemployed benefits, Inequality and Mobility.


In some ways, the government has openly acknowledged the serious problems of inequality and mobility.  They have to solve them before the next election.  Whether they can succeed in convincing Singaporeans is a critical winning factor. 


What Lawrence Wong said recently can be seen as the preparations for the coming general election.  Inequality, mobility and help to unemployed persons are to be included in the Forward Singapore which will then be used during the election campaign.    


Any guessing of early elections is meaningless until the political project of Forward Singapore is completed.  To be honest, when you look at the handouts and possible unemployment benefits to be given out, time is bad and maybe worse than expected.  


The PAP thinks Forward Singapore can do a second Tharman effect. Voters who believe in Forward Singapore will strongly give a  mandate to the PAP.  This is why the party and some supporters believe the PAP will win handsomely like what Thaman did in the Presidential Election.


The question is how good are their solutions in tackling inequality and mobility?  And how many are convinced and willing to give the PAP a second chance or third chance?  Inequality and mobility include almost every important topic, like housing, good jobs, education, healthcare, cost of living, transport, water and even the unemployment benefits.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more