Skip to main content

高薪养廉下的救火队和拆弹专家 张志贤,善达曼,陈川仁。。。

 

高薪养廉下的救火队和拆弹专家

张志贤,善达曼,陈川仁。。。


从故居门,国会谎言门,再到现在的租屋门,原来新加坡庞大的内阁阵容,就是时时刻刻为突发事件做准备。因为,有些人平时不做事,一旦出事,就担任救火队队长,拆弹专家。

张志贤再次出任救火队队长,处理租屋门。这是他在故居门后,再次出来担任拆弹专家。不论他是否成功,不论他在故居门的表现如何,总之,就是要有人出来灭火。

灭火后,再来收拾下一步怎么走。这是人民行动党的惯例。而救火队队长的身份,不能太低,太低就没有威信,说服不了支持者,同情者。

而这个人一定要有在国会发言的机会,不然,就失去一个保护伞,一个自我检讨,自我反省的空间。不要忘记,国会的一切发言都是受到保护的。

那么,善达曼又扮演什么角色?不做救火队的工作,也不做拆弹专家。但是,善达曼却以智者,一个有远见,一个人人期待的总理人选,让内阁里,不至于出现没有人才的感觉,没有公信力。

因为,有人还是希望有一天善达曼可能出来领导国家。而且认为他是最适合的人选。这对内阁来说,对于新加坡人来说,可以起到,最少有一个信得过的接班人

因此,新加坡内阁高薪养廉,养了两个资深的部长,同样是前副总理的张志贤和善达曼。至于陈川仁,贵为国会议长和前部长,他在国会和说谎门的表现,大家心知肚明,不用多说了。

新加坡内阁,政府机构,法定机构,拥有庞大的多余冗员,有时是不得已的事。高薪养廉有时真的的是为不时之需做准备!

这就是为什么政府可以设定一个议题,设定一个人的印象,大众观感,然后,救火队加入放火,放弹,把反对党人抹黑,过去如此,一直到现在的梁文辉‘对抗风格’和不规矩行为。

行动党政府的救火队、拆弹专家,还能像以前那样发挥巨大的作用吗?还是越来越难取信于人?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...