Skip to main content

从故居门到租屋门,低级道德错误不停。 法理中的小便宜,‘不让’精神燃烧中。

 

从故居门到租屋门,低级道德错误不停。

法理中的小便宜,‘不让’精神燃烧中。


人民行动党有一条硬道理,就是双规。在法律规定下,可以做的事情,尽量去做;有小便宜,尽量捡。在法律规定外的事情,不要接触,不要动,即使是大利益,也不要拿;拿了就是贪污。

从故居门到现在的租屋门,人民行动党政府就是要告诉人民,从总理到部长,他们所做的所有事情,都是在法规之内,符合法律标准,没有偏袒任何人,经得起考验,甚至在国会里辩论,接受质询。

因此,如果他们有什么瑕疵,就是道德、伦理上的问题。国会、法庭和法律无权对道德和伦理做出判断,谁是谁非,家家有本难念的经。

而且,国会和法律只是看证据和所谓的独立调查,只要把这些解释化作法规内可以进行,可以拿的小便宜,那就什么大事都可以化作小事,之后就不了了之。

行动党还有一个绝对优势,在国会里有超过90%的议席。因此,所谓的道德瑕疵是可以修正、修改的。以前的事情,不加追究;将来的事情,不可以重覆。

这样又过了一关。新加坡选民也认为,这样做,勉强还可以,就不再追究。

从故居门到租屋门,我们就一直看到低级道德错误不停, 不断发生。当然,我们一次又一次的让行动党政府渡过万重山,一次又一次拿了小便宜。事实上,我们在放纵法理中的小便宜,合理化小便宜行为。结果,我们鼓励社会上,人人可以拿小便宜,只要不犯法,肥水不流外人田。

无形中,‘不让’精神在燃烧中,在发扬光大,多样化。不拿合法,规定内的小便宜,才是傻瓜!

这好像避税和逃税之间的灰色地带。聪明的会计师懂得如何避税,走擦边球,在法规内游走,而不让你背上逃税的责任。一线之差,定了生死,道德伦理放一边。


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...