Skip to main content

If Malaysia were a ‘failed state’, What is the consequence for Singapore? Were we became half a ‘failed state’?

 If Malaysia were a ‘failed state’, What is the consequence for Singapore? Were we became half a ‘failed state’?



The former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad in his 2022 New Year message saw no change in Malaysian politics and warned of the danger of Malaysia becoming a failed state.

Mahathir is a controversial figure, like Lee Kuan Yew.  Some may disagree that Lee is a controversial figure.  But our current economic and political problems, 4G, FICA, POFMA, no free lunch, stop at two, languages, cultural development etc… can not run away from Lee Kuan Yew and his influence.  

Bad or good we have to accept it and look forward to avoiding the mistakes happening in Malaysia.  

Yes, if Malaysia were a failed state, judging from the recent flood management, nobody seems to know what to do and command,  (they even outshine us by saying once in 100 years), what Singapore can do if our neighbour failed?

Just look around, in the community, in the HDB, what is the consequence of a failed neighbour? In the USA, we can easily see many failed neighbourhoods. So, what will happen next to us if Malaysia were a failure?

Malaysia is yet to become a failed state.  But there are many lessons we can learn from Malaysia.  

This is why if Malaysia were a failed state, Singapore would become half a failed state.  Look at our election system, judiciary, courts, AG, GICs, key appointments, if Malaysia is 100% failed, we are 50% failed. 

We wish Malaysia all the best, hope over fear. A healthy neighbour is good for Singapore. We cannot just go shopping in Malaysia. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more