Skip to main content

新现实、新常态。 高教育不再享受高收入。

新现实、新常态。

高教育不再享受高收入。



统计数据显示,大学毕业生的收入在冠病疫情期间,连续两年减少。从政府的立场出发,很自然的可以归咎于新冠疫情,把它解释为暂时性、过渡性现象。疫情过后,会改善。



但是,即使去年的经济取得7.2%成长,大学毕业生的收入没有回稳,反而下跌,这当然也可以说是短暂现象,有机会反弹,收入最后会进一步上升。


但是,也有一种现象,新加坡工资水平,尤其是大学毕业生的收入,出现瓶颈。想要进一步提升,整个经济的结构必须改变,寻找更加高增值的机会,这就牵涉到政府和人力资源的创新、生产力的提高。当然,外来相对比较低工资人才的竞争,更加会导致本地人的工资失去竞争力。


冠病只是把这种瓶颈现象,提早把瓶颈呈现出来。过去几十年,我们利用外来劳动力,压抑本地工资的行为和政策,并没有停止过。疫情过后,这种行为和政策将会继续,因此,本地毕业生的工资,想要回复到以前年年有增加的美景,似乎难上加难。


这是一个新的现实、新的常态。家庭的开支因为通货膨胀而上升,因为消费税而上升,但是,工资却处于瓶颈状态,这是一个很不好受的残酷现实。


那么,人民行动党政府会有什么政策对付这个新现实、新常态?李显龙做了10多年总理,你认为他会有新方法吗?我们现在的困境,虽然未经证实的储备一大推,但是,不论3G还是4G,你有看到‘虎虎生威’的一面吗?


没有。


我们不只看到恶狼在增加人民的负担,还看到狐狸在国会内外,狡猾的找借口,找理由蒙骗过关。


真是。苛政猛于虎。


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...