Skip to main content

风水轮流转,李光耀的报应: 无人清理,几层楼高垃圾出现在行动党市镇会。

风水轮流转,李光耀的报应:

无人清理,几层楼高垃圾出现在行动党市镇会。




2011年大选,李光耀警告阿裕尼选民,如果把票投给工人党,这里就会变成贫民区。当然,垃圾也会无人清理,就像现在发生在人民行动党管理的市镇那样。


李光耀同时也说,阿裕尼选民会后悔5年。11年过去了。风水轮流转,无人清理垃圾的情形,居然在行动党管理的市镇发生。当然,我们可以借口,冠病疫情导致人手不足,因此,发生这样的事情,可以原谅。


如果这件事情发生在工人党的市镇会,那么,行动党政府会这么说?他们一定会重提李光耀当年的警告,现在应验了。


风水轮流转,行动党已经不是当年讲求效率,讲求绩效,追求最好,追求第一的政党。组屋垃圾清理无能,无效率,低生产力,已经证明李显龙政府无法提供李光耀时代的政绩。


这是新加坡人必须面对的命运。我们可以选择让李显龙和4G继续在低效率,高工资的模式下,继续管理新加坡。当然,也可以换政府。选民有权决定自己要的政府,继续选择现在这样连垃圾清理都会出问题的李显龙政府,还是要让反对党试一试。




李显龙政府不只是面对风水轮流转的管理命运,同时,在很多决策上,也朝向豪赌轮盘、豪赌运气的方向发展。这从冠病疫情的控制措施,消费税的提出,言论限制法令等等可以看出来。因为连一个人举牌都可以构成犯罪行为,这样的保赢赌法,可以说已经用尽了豪赌手段。


从风水轮流转到赌运气,新加坡人看不到李显龙政府的执政能力,只看到总理和部长在豪赌新加坡的储备,熬尽我们的老本,忘了初心,却拿不出业绩来。或许,正如李显龙自己说的:行动党来到另一个转折点。这个转折点可以是风水轮流转,也可以是赌运气,李显龙和行动党的选择其实并不多。




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...