Skip to main content

离休后的人民行动党部长议员,继续追钱、找钱。


最近有一条新闻说,前部长吕德耀找到新工作,在一家上市公司担任董事。这不过是人民行动党离休后的部长议员的正常钱途。他们在担任部长议员的时候,已经钱途一片光明,部长的年薪高,人人都知道。议员的收入也不少,单单公司的董事费,再加上本身的职业收入,议员的津贴,他们的总收入,已经达到新加坡上层家庭的收入了。

那么,为何离休后,还要继续追钱?钱不够用?

或许,这是他们的本性,钱自然是越多越好,哪有人嫌弃钱。因此,离休后,他们没有忘记这个本性,当然要继续找钱、追钱、反正,这是正道。担任公司董事,还是出任什么重要职位,这些都是合法,合情合理,没有可以非议的地方。

即使不是离休,落选的候选人,行动党也会安排一些职位,总之,不会亏待候选人。让他们的生活,收入有保障。

人民行动党为候选人,部长,议员规划了一条钱途。而这条钱途,是建立在部长高薪上的。部长带头拿高薪,其他的议员也跟上,利用董事费,兼职来补上。离休后,不离本行,继续留在钱途路上。

这是行动党的游戏规则。而要确保这个游戏继续玩下去,就是要继续做政府。

为什么,离休后,行动党部长议员不会想到做一些公益事业,而要继续找钱、追钱?他们不累吗?他们没有积德之心吗?

压根,他们的脑子里,除了钱途外,没有其他的公益要做。他们的人生,就只有钱途,没有其他选择。这样的国家领导,您害怕吗?

因为,他们知道一旦投身公益事业,他们不单钱途没有了,很大可能,这些公益事业的利益,就会和行动党的政策冲突。这么一来,他们就变成社会运动者,甚至,变成反对党支持者。陈清木,陈如斯,陈钦亮就是例子。

【天之道,损有馀而补不足。
人之道则不然,损不足以奉有馀 - 老子77章】

行动党人的钱途论,和他们部长,议员,离休前和离休后的所作所为,其实符合老子的人之道- 损不足以奉有馀。那些有余的人(如行动党的部长,议员)想要更多,因此,那些没有的,不足的,就要压缩自己的钱包,来辅助那些有余的。

在行动党的钱途路上,谁是有余的,谁是不足者?不正是那些投票给行动党的选民吗?

那么,新加坡有没有‘损有馀而补不足’的傻瓜?

偏偏新加坡还有这些傻瓜,偏偏新加坡还有肯为人民牺牲的人。而行动党则定义这些人是失败者,资历低的人,或者,事业无成,学业不精,无所事事的人。有些,还被定义为社会上的捣乱份子,言论的煽动者。

而大多数的选民也同意行动党的说法。他们看到钱途,而不是前途。

那么,到底是行天之道的傻瓜幸福还是行人之道的行动党追钱一族幸福?

或许,只有在钱途末路时,才知道。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...