Skip to main content

感恩一次就够了,一党独大绝对无法持续强大新加坡。

感恩一次就够了,一党独大绝对无法持续强大新加坡。




2015大选,为了感恩,新加坡选民给人民行动党强有力的支持。感恩一次就足够了,感恩不能当饭吃,更加不能确保国家长治久安,永续发展。

大家都知道经济前景不好,每一次经济不好,行动党最先拿人民来开刀。1986年,李显龙领导的经济委员会,就大幅度削减工资和公积金缴交率。之后,每次出现经济危机,就削减工资、公积金来提高竞争力。

尤其当行动党无法解决生产力的问题时,就只能依靠削减工资来提高竞争力了。

在全民团结,共同面对经济危机的号召下,行动党专门选择最容易的政策-工资,来提高竞争力。行动党要求人民作出牺牲,它认为只有这样做才能保住饭碗。真的如此吗?

为什么每一次都是人民第一个做出牺牲,而在经济复苏后,却是最后一个得到好处。不幸遇到经济转型,或者再度陷入不景气,工资不但无法提高,还要再度下降。

选民认清了这套猴戏,明白了行动党的把戏,就知道为什么经济高速增长,而贫富距离却越来越大。当然,也要看清谁是‘低薪工友10年没有加薪’的黑手了。

可以预见,李显龙政府处理经济问题的方案将会继续是换汤不换药。而牺牲人民利益,将会是他的 惯例。

美国民主党初选,为什么克林顿夫人一直面对桑德斯的严峻挑战?因为,民主党支持者和中立选民认为桑德斯才能保障他们的利益,公平分配利益。而克林顿夫人却是当权者的延续,解决问题没有新的创意,不但如此,她还保护财团,保护大企业。

不论美国,新加坡,还是其他国家,当权者看来都是用老方法来治理国家。因此,在美国这样的民主国家,反抗的声音就特别的大。现在,即使克林顿夫人最后成为民主党总统候选人,她也必须接纳桑德斯的意见,融合民主党内的反对派和中间选民,才能胜出。

武吉巴督选民,阿穆中选,代表了行动党无须改变,老方法照旧用,人民最先被牺牲。如果,徐顺全当选,他就像桑德斯那样,要求行动党政府考虑人民的利益,而不是财团,大企业,政联公司的利益。

徐顺全能够在国会处处提醒政府,把人民的利益放在第一位,而不是1986年以来的李显龙的老药方。

李显龙在宣布武吉巴督补选时,要求选民选出最能代表他们利益的候选人。事实摆在面前,阿穆只能是一个花瓶,而徐顺全却是大声公,在国会提醒行动党做出利民的改变。

补选开打以来,行动党除了人身攻击外,没有提到如何经世济民的建议,也不想辩论国家面对的问题。比较理性的副总理尚达曼,并没有提出治国的政策来反驳徐顺全。

行动党只想通过媒体,避重就轻的让这次的补选,不知不觉的过去。然后,李显龙处理经济危机的老方法又再度出现。其结果当然是要人民买单,继续牺牲下去。

XXXX

香港特区政府最近推出一套反贪污的连续剧《廉政行動2016》。它的第一集以真实档案反映香港选举的贪污行为。

在香港很多非法的选举活动,拉票行为,文字宣传,到了新加坡却被合法化。武吉巴督选民,在冷静日,不妨花一点时间(从连续剧11.30分钟开始)了解香港和新加坡的不同民主历程。

看清楚,香港政府(虽然是一个中国特区)如何提醒民主选举,防止选举舞弊。相对比,新加坡政府是如何压制民主选举。

难道作为一个独立的民主国家,新加坡真的只有一党独大的选择吗?而我们明哲保身,沉默是金的继续让人民行动党为所欲为,而让为新加坡民主奋斗的人,如徐顺全,继续面对不公平的选举制度吗?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slo5FPjW9Tk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...