Skip to main content

渴望 * 改变


在人民行动党看来,2011年的大选,还是小儿科,小改变而已。2015年的大选才是真正的分水岭。 主要原因是李光耀不在了,行动党的“诸葛亮”不见了。因此,这是50多年来,第一个没有“行动党神算”的大选。 所以,行动党才觉得何去何从。


提起在今年3月23日逝世的建国总理李光耀时,黄永宏一度语塞,眼眶泛红。他说:“即使李光耀先生在25年前卸下总理职务,他一直都在我们身旁提供献策……来临大选,是一场没有李先生的大选。我们不再有一个李光耀来告诉我们什么才是更好的决定,我们也不再有一个李光耀来为我们做的决定提出意见。”】http://news.omy.sg/News/Features/story20150727-362494

现在,行动党才公开的告诉国人,这50,60年来,真正的行动党指导是李光耀。他的离去让行动党上下不知所措,在面临政治的新常态时,失去信心。


当然,这个2015分水岭的最高意义,还是改变。李总理昨天说:


Show the world what Singapore can be.
其实,应该说成,

Show the world what Singapore can be without LKY.

Show the world what Singapore can be without the PAP.  


总理告诉新加坡年轻人,要向世界宣示新加坡“能”,其实,他忘记说出重点:


一个没有李光耀的新加坡,我们还是“行”的。


一个没有行动党的新加坡,我们还是“行”的。


不然,分水岭的意义就显示不出来。不然,就是看不到改变。


黄永宏没有进一步说明,但是,分水岭就是改变。不然,为何说2015大选是分水岭。分水岭当然要和以前不同,不同就是改变。


渴望改变, 终于来了。


这50,60年来,即使在李光耀掌控的高峰时期,也有20多, 30多百分点的新加坡选民不满行动党。2011年已经高达40百分点。2015年,如果要成为分水岭,那当然就是要增加更加多反对票了。


“神算”已经不在,行动党没有底,李显龙也不知道。他只能叫黄永宏出来说,这是分水岭。但是,又没有讲清楚,新的百分点是多少?所以,黄永宏只能眼睛红红,说“诸葛亮”不在,所以,出现分水岭。


事实上,这个新的百分点,大家心里都没有数,不同的选区,不同的候选人,就会出现不同的百分点。


而行动党现在,正在需要“诸葛亮神算”的时候,却偏偏没有这个精神支持。看来,这年薪几百万元的总理,部长高位,越来越难做了,做到了尽头了。您想一想,很多政联公司的头头,如新电讯,甚至地铁公司总裁也是百万以上收入,但是,却没有这个政治风险。


总理,部长为他们创造这么丰厚的工作,自己却要面对改变的命运。难怪,黄永宏要哭出来。


改变的时刻已经到来,渴望已久的改变终于有了眉目。分水岭后,行动党“纸上谈兵”的将军们,又有多几个会步杨荣文将军的后尘。


其中,有个吕将军,似乎是自废武功,集选区被废,他只能喊冤。另一个陈将军,在丹绒巴葛,叫反对党不要把他当成战利品,不应该把战胜李光耀的选区,当成是一个荣耀。不过,最岌岌可危的却是另一位陈将军,因为,他遇到一只下山的老虎。


改变是为要成就一个更好的新加坡,一个没有李光耀的新加坡,一个没有行动党一党独大的新加坡。



悠悠岁月 欲说当年好困惑 亦真亦幻难取舍
悲欢离合 都曾经有过
这样执着 究竟为什么?
漫漫人生路 上下求索 心中渴望...真诚的生活
谁能告诉我 是对还是错
问询南来 北往的客

恩怨忘却 留下真情从头说
相伴人间 万家灯火 故事不多
宛如平常一段歌 过去未来共斟酌




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...