Skip to main content

《洋人不准进入》,新加坡日弄巧反拙。

新加坡可是越来越威风了,在洋人的地盘竟然不让洋人进入新加坡日的庆祝会。真想不到,新加坡政府在澳洲的一小片短暂的不到一天的租界,竟然表演出一幕《洋人与狗不准进入》的种族歧视风波#1

行动党政府真的是流年不利,做好事竟然变成坏事,我们的副总理张志贤还特地的赶到新加坡日大吃会现场,拉近与海外新加坡人的感情,与新加坡人同乐,却不与澳洲人同乐,难怪一些澳洲人,感到为何在自己的国家,竟然会有当年上海租界的《华人与狗不准进入》的同样感觉。

你说,新加坡威风不威风。我们有钱,有能力把小贩飞到澳洲去,短暂的借用你们的公园,和国民一起玩乐,一起怀念新加坡的美好日子。虽然说是短暂的经济建设,但对澳洲经济来说,不也是一小庄贡献吗?为何说我们歧视澳洲白人,看不起你们,不让你们进入会场,还向电台投诉,新加坡人忘恩负义,忘了澳洲人曾经为保卫新加坡做出牺牲#2

或许,我们真的忘了二战,我们真的忘了(英澳纽新马)五国联防,我们真的忘了洋人还真的有过为了保卫新加坡做出牺牲,为了新加坡经济出过策划做出贡献。因为,50多年的行动党政治,好像只有行动党在做牺牲,行动党在做贡献,连辛劳的新加坡人都没有贡献,怎么会轮到洋人呢!

澳洲洋人白人感觉受到歧视,不能到新加坡日大吃会上吃到新加坡美食,心里愤愤不平,因此投诉澳洲电台,觉得这是不公平,其他国家在澳洲办大吃会,欢迎澳洲白人,目的是推动主办国的美食,欢迎洋人参与,为何新加坡人的想法与人不同,还拒人千里之外?

为何在国内,口口声声说我们是一个包容的 inclusive  社会,到了国外,就改变嘴脸说这是一个exclusive 大吃会。

洋人白人可能根本不知道资本主义的运作。他们又怎么知道新加坡行动党政府是如何操作资本主义的。有没有听过美国运通的会员是有特权的。当那一片小地方成了新加坡暂时的小租界时,新加坡人就有这个特权。

这里再举一个特权的例子。每年F1在新加坡的会期,不是在市区圈出一些地方,让跑车跑圈圈吗?你要到圈里去吃喝玩乐,你就需要买票入场,不论洋人黑人还是其他人,没有买票就不能进入。买了票,你就有普通权进入会场。但是,澳洲白人还是不甘心,我们想买票,还是不行,新加坡方面不卖票。对了!即使在F1会场,你只有VIP特权,才能进入VIP的招待所,这些地方是不卖票的。明白吗?这是商业运作。

洋人白人还是不明白,你们新加坡日哪里是什么商业运作?明明白白就是让人大吃大喝,让新加坡人高兴而已。如果是这么简单,那就不是行动党政府。行动党绝对不相信免费的午餐,哪里有理由给人家吃免费,让新加坡人在澳洲免费吃喝玩乐?

澳洲洋人白人或许根本无法想象行动党政府是结合商业运作,政治活动,包容保外的高手。行动党所花的每一分钱,都要考虑回报的。什么回报?洋人还是不明白。大选的时候,洋人或许就会明白。

不论是大选,补选,还是总统选举,在关键的决定胜负的最后关头,或许有一天行动党必须要依靠海外选票才能赢得选举的胜利。因此,在海外,行动党并不对洋人inclusive, 而是对国人inclusive。洋人是应该被exclusive 对待的,因为他们手中没有新加坡选票。
没有这个特权,怎么能够来新加坡日免费的大吃大喝呢! 
在榜鹅东补选中,行动党候选人在海外选票中胜出。在27张海外选票中,行动党得19张票,工人党只有7张,另一张为废票。#3

新加坡日的成本不轻,以上回在纽约的集会来看,每个人头成本大约1000元。这回出席澳洲新加坡日的人数超过6000人,你说这要花多少钱?因此,花钱搞新加坡日活动,是要讲商业运作,讲投资回报的。希望你们吃喝玩乐后,告诉自己也告诉家人未来怎么做,在关键时刻,做出正确的政治经济判断。

洋人白人这么单纯,他们怎么会想到这么多,如果要想这么深,他们可能就不来了。不只是不来, 他们很可能反对在市区画圈圈,阻止跑车在他们认为的公地跑动,搞商业活动,吸引外来投资。

哎呀,洋人白人如何能够了解行动党政府,说白了,就连我们新加坡人又如何看得透行动党的居心。免费的午餐,门都没有。


#1

#2

#3
Of the 27 votes, 19 went to the People's Action Party and seven to the Workers' Party. There was one spoilt vote.

Comments

  1. mail@yuenco.com:
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    October 18, 2013 at 7:11 am (Quote)

    the blog address is pijitailai.blogspot.ca so it is a Chinese person living in Canada; not sure whether he/she was actually in that Australian park to witness the event himself/herself, or only heard someone else’s recounting; also not sure why he/she only complained about white people being excluded from Singapore day feast; surely PRC people would have been excluded too, and maybe that’s what he/she was really upset about?

    in any case, it seems not unreasonable to exclude non-Singaporeans from the event; excluded people having some annoyance, that’s understandable, but the way this guy/girl went on about it is, shall we say, interesting

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...