The
answer is yes if there is a change of government in Malaysia after 5 May 2013. The
new government led by PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim will present a
very different Malaysia, in many ways more dynamic, energetic and powerful than
before.
Why
is it so? The 3-party coalition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is doing some things that
make Singapore success: A Malaysia for all Malaysians and good governance, accountability and transparency.
["Some civil servants told me they are worried because Chinese now are more active in politics.
"Why are you afraid? Because he is smart? Because he is brave? Because he is persistent? Or because he is hard working?
"Why you don't elect such person instead of leaders who are stupid?" he asks, adding that the nation needs capable leaders of all races to lead the government.] – Anwar Ibrahim
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/228615
This
is the message PR wants to bring to Malaysian voters and there is 50% chance
that voters will buy this idea and give Anwar a chance to run a dynamic
Malaysia.
Now compare this to Singapore and look at the following and you will know why it is inflexible and refuses to change.
[He said: “Doesn’t matter how things happen overseas, you may have strikes, you may have riots, you may have demonstrations when you have unhappiness. In Singapore, if there’s a problem, let us find out early. Let’s talk about it, let’s nip it in the bud, resolve it harmoniously and if necessary through arbitration. Let’s do it in a mature, adult way, which is constructive and helps us to move forward together.”] – Lee Hsien Loonghttp://www.todayonline.com/singapore/pm-lee-stresses-importance-tripartism-singapore
There
are two observations here. First we know
already the May Day protest which had attracted 5000 (or 3000 based on MSM) people.
Is PM Lee going to talk to them or just leave the matters die off? I don’t
know. But based on past experience the answer is no.
Again,
the past experience issue comes back for the second observation. The past success of “union, employers and
government” is to be maintained and strengthened. So, we see the May Day headline:
“Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has stressed the importance of
tripartism in the country.”
Tripartism
worked well in the past because the rich-poor gap was small. Singapore has since joined
the top ranking countries in Gini index. This model is certainly needed to be
changed or discarded with a new model.
So, we are looking
at two different developments in Malaysia and Singapore: A dynamic one across
the causeway and a status quo in Lion city.
Why
is dynamic possible in Malaysia? The
past 5-year economic performance of Selangor and Penang states indicates the
possibility. These two economic powerhouses are held by PR in Malaysia after
2008.
They
manage the budget well:
FINANCIAL HEALTH: Both states placed a similar emphasis on achieving financial health. Penang projected an increase in revenue as high as 83.6% in 2013 compared to RM385.9mil in 2012. It also recorded a budget surplus of RM138mil for 2011, an increase of 312% compared to RM33mil in 2010 when there was a 95% reduction of debt. In the meantime, Selangor too recorded positive results with an increase in revenues from RM1.57bil (2010) to RM1.634bil (2011), as well as a 22% increase in its consolidated fund from RM1.58bil (2010) to RM1.944bil (2011). Both Penang and Selangor did well in managing their financial health.http://penangmonthly.com/state-budgets-2013-the-last-for-now/
And
the reason for doing well is quite similar to Singapore:
[A common theme in the Pakatan states over the past four years has been that of good governance, accountability and transparency, which was used once again in this final budget speech. Selangor’s budget closed with a reminder to all that the coalition was one that stood for all Malaysians regardless of race, political ideology, religion or colour, and the idea of “good and clean house-keeping” that ought to be an example for the nation at large. Penang’s budget ended with the focus on responsible government, peace, stability and the desire for a state that is green, clean, healthy and safe.]http://penangmonthly.com/state-budgets-2013-the-last-for-now/
Good
governance, accountability and transparency. Imagine if these principles are
applied to the federal level, how much budget savings can they save and how
much productivity can they improve?
A
PR federal government will bring dynamism to Malaysian economy. If there are fewer
corruptions less cronies and more open tenders and transparency, we will see a
new Malaysia and inclusive Malaysia.
While
in Singapore, we still maintain our old practices and still dream of our old
success. What we see in Malaysia is a big or total change and in Singapore a small
or modified change.
Here
are two examples that a dynamic Malaysia is possible under PR:
Reasons for better
service and income
Selangor
chief minister Tan Sri Dato' Seri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim explained to voters the
reason why the state is able to provide free water and better services to
residents. When he took power, he asked
the chief secretary to check the reserve with the banks. As reported in Sin
Chew the reserve was RM 500 million and after the checking the banks replied
they were ready to give 2% interest. So, the state has now an interest income
of RM 10 million for redistribution to the people. It looked like there was no
interest payment in the past.
Selangor
state reserve is small compared to Singapore. A small percentage point difference
in interest or investment return from our reserve will make a big difference to
Singaporeans. If our government is as generous as Selangor state, may be every
household should be given free broadband service, especially poor families.
This
is why the question of our reserve is an important issue. Its good governance, accountability
and transparency cannot be left unchecked and the President has an important
role to safe guide the reserve.
Political ignorance
and ignoring the facts
Another
example is Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA). When more than 70%, 80% of the Chinese voters are
not going to vote for you, there must be some big problems with the party. Instead they ask the Chinese voters what they
really want. In the top 50 richest persons in Malaysia, many of them are Chinese
and this ratio is higher than the racial ratio of Malaysia.
MCA
likes the PAP only looks at the monetary side, the rich and fails to recognise equal
opportunity, justice, fair treatment, and the Chinese education, etc. Our second
phase of SG Conversation is to touch on philosophical aspect. It will be a
great challenge for the PAP to think out of money and figures in this second
phase of national discussion.
In
conclusion, a PR federal government in Malaysia is good news (encouragement) to
the Singapore oppositions. It is also good for the PAP as a new dynamic
competitor will make the PAP work harder (hopefully).
Comments
Post a Comment