Skip to main content

性事重重,走下神台,行动党何去何从?


防备了贪污,防不了色。防备了色之后,不知又会出现什么新花样。真是防不胜防,行动党政府终须要面对一个现实 人性的弱点,不是高薪,不是一党独大的垄断,不是表面的掩饰,也不是制度的制约所能完全克制住的。

行动党政府一直要塑造的完美形象,一直要在国民教育,在道德价值,树立一个国际楷模的神台,也终归要走向人间,做个凡人。我们在经济利益下,在权力发放上,也和其他国家和地区一样,50步笑一百步,以往我们看别人的酒色财气,桃色八卦,现在别人也以同样的目光笑看我们。

但是为何近来特别的多?难道以前没有吗?尤其是,2011年大选过后,这些负面消息,接二连三的出现,行政效率出现问题,道德人品出现问题,社会的贫富不均出现问题,。。

主流媒体开放了,还是新媒体的压力

这是不是说现在的主流媒体比以前开放了呢!可以问心无愧了呢?还可以偶尔爆料,刺激一些销路,卖多几份报纸,提高一下收视率。还或者是新媒体的兴起,有些料,主流媒体不爆的话,新媒体,也可以做到图文并茂,甚至以录像形式出现。

垄断讯息,控制新闻,这个行动党政府的强项,在网络时代,很可能变成一个行动党的负资产。越是像以前那样,报喜不报忧,对行动党不利的新闻就封锁,越是对行动党不利。因为,这将导致行动党在保护下成长,一旦出现变数,就手忙脚乱,应该坚决处理,果敢决断的事,却推三阻四,迟迟没有给人民清楚交代,使到谣言满天飞。当然,人民对政府的信心也就自然大打折扣了。

谁来监督政府?

主流媒体原本的责任就是监督政府,不然为何叫做无冕皇帝。但是,几十年来,主流媒体除了传播政府的讯息外,还为新加坡人民带来什么呢?就是因为自废武功,反而导致政府在缺少外来监督的情形下,自我感觉良好,没有看到政府内部出现问题。政府越是管制媒体,控制媒体,就是自我放弃监督,好的时候,运作正常的时候,当然很好。一旦出现无法细查的问题,私人的问题,性事重重的时候,那就想监督都来不及了。

对高官高管们,因为,根本就没有这意识,还以为主流媒体已已被控制,想发消息,还要过政府这关。但是,人算不如天算,偏偏就是没有这个监督,没有这个警惕,就出事了。

在民主国家,原本在野党就是应该扮演监督政府的角色,但是,在行动党的精心策划下,在选举制度的随意更改下,国会始终没有出现一个有力量制衡行动党政府的在野势力。因此,既没有主流媒体监督,也没有在野党监督,行动党又如何健全的成长。一个收到保护,从小被娇生惯养的新行动党领袖,能够应对新的挑战, 更加复杂的国内外的局势吗?

因此,行动党在性事重重下,没有办法,因为纸包不住火,搞的不好,如果不让事情曝光,万一新媒体,或者是其他外国媒体知道,大大的给予宣传,不是对自己更不利吗?倒不如断尾求生,牺牲几个高官,还能赢得到人们认为行动党已经改变,比以前开放了的美声。

行动党从神降为人的痛苦

行动党的神台没有了,人们现在普遍认为行动党是会出错的,会做错事的。 而且,也会出现效率低,监管不力的情形。行动党终于要走下神台,和普通人一样,一样会出错,一样有效率低的时候,一样也会面对情色的诱惑,一样也有人性的弱点。

走向现实,没有垄断保护,不能利用高压手段压制异己的新政治常态,将会给行动党怎么样的打击,行动党又将何去何从呢?新加坡又将何去何从?这是否意味着我们的黄金时代即将过去,行动党已经变不出什么新把戏,而要靠在野党大力监督,才能奋发图强。更或者,被一个更强大的政党所取代。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...