Realistic GE2025? 6 60 years of one party rule, will GE2025 end it or extend it? To be or not to be? Step up or slow down?

Realistic GE2025? 6

60 years of one party rule, will GE2025 end it or extend it? To be or not to be? Step up or slow down?

Positive thinking: Singaporeans want opposition but not in their backyards. With a super low birth rate, your backyards will soon be taken over by others. Act now! 40% popular votes is not enough, we need to step up the change.

Don’t let gerrymandering delay the awakening!

Don’t let vouchers, discounts blur you.

Don’t let PORMA silent you.

Don’t let affordable housing confuse you.

Even with lower than 50% popular votes, the PAP can still easily form the government. In the 2013 Malaysian general election, Najib’s BN formed the government with 47% popular votes. While his opponent got 51%.

The worst case scenario is the 2024 election in the UK, where Labour only got 33.7%. (look like Tony Tan’s presidency win). But with a comfortable majority seats to form the Labour government.

In Singapore, no one will expect the PAP’s vote share to go down to 50%, perhaps, not even 55%. So what’s the worry, backyard or not backyard, just vote for a non-PAP candidate. The honest reality is before and after GE 2025, the PAP will be the government.

The question is whether we want to end the one party rule.

Comments

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party. This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central. To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes. How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy. However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012. 2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP? Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP? Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes. And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...

否极泰来 Piji Tailai

Search This Blog