Skip to main content

PAP的“初心”平衡策略,英康保险如何做到?

 P A P的“初心”平衡策略,英康保险如何做到?

英康保险要出卖了。要卖给一间德国公司。民间反应认为,违背初心,连许通美也引用拉惹勒南的警告,

‘不要把新加坡发展成为一个只懂价格,而不知价值的国家’。

英康保险出卖,是否违背初心?英康保险当然不这样认为。未来资本,增加资本,强强结合、互补,反而让英康有更大的发展机会。同时,也能为国人提供更好的、价廉的保单。初心未变,服务更好,为国贡献更加大。根本是强化初心?

因此,指责出卖是违背初心,并不适当。人家为发展,为提供更好的服务而做出出卖选择,考虑到大从的利益,引进外来资本和国际联系。所以,更应当被看成发扬光大初心,维护初心,加强初心的行为。

那么,为什么有些国人,还是认为这是违背初心,出卖祖业的行为。这些人是否应该被禁言、被批评?当然不可以,不然,民意、民声、民生、如何找到管道发泄。事实上,无声的沉默才是最可怕,一旦爆发,不可收拾。

或许,我们可以通过三个例子,看看新加坡初心的不见,改变,维护和金钱支持的初心。

南洋大学的1955年创校初心不见了。新加坡还有几个人记得?行动党的偷龙转凤初心策略,不可谓不成功。

华联银行收购案,最后以理念相近,与大华银行结合。放弃发展银行的强制收购,选择大华,可以说是维护初心,结合后,初心得以保存、维持下去。

需要金钱支持的初心 - 新报业媒体信托。或许很难相信,以前还是上市公司,赚钱行业,现在需要政府注入援助金,才能维持初心。或许,这个初心,与时并进,迎合时代变迁和不同时段政权需要。

看到报业媒体的新发展,我们应该庆幸英康没有像政府要钱,继续维护初心。或许,为了平息民心,英康最后将落入三大银行中的一间,就像当年的储蓄银行那样,虽然做不成‘人民的银行’,最终,还是肥水落入新加坡。英康作为‘人民的保险公司’,是否也会殊途同归?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...