Skip to main content

民选总统变成守门jaga 何晶言论代不代表政府? 会不会演变成PAP负资产? 善意提示还是警告威胁?

 民选总统变成守门jaga

何晶言论代不代表政府

会不会演变成PAP负资产

善意提示还是警告威胁


【笑话。台湾首富郭台铭 (如果是新加坡人)可以轻易取得新加坡的总统候选人资格。但是,却不能获得国民党提名出征,竞选台湾最高领导人大位。天不时地不利人不和???】


一般上,国家领导人的另一半,不会对政府的治国提意见。最明显的是马英九,他的另一半还要离职,以表清白,不与公务挂钩。其他的另一半,有些喜欢金银珠宝,有些花枝招展,有些幕后支持。


何晶对于民选总统的职权,再度发表看法。这回她说,总统犹如jaga 看门、守门,不需要知道保险箱里面装了什么,政府在急需用钱的时候,就把门打开。


从不是独立行事,不是监督政府,不是人民投诉社会病态的地方,到现在的看门守门说,总统的地位可以说是每下愈况。越说下去,越低下。不论多低下,庄子说道都在其中。守门看门也要有门道!


因此,何晶的说法,到底代不代表人民行动党政府?政府没有表示同意,支持;也没有表示不同意,不支持。言论自由


普通老百姓很轻易认为,贵为总理夫人,名正言顺,当然具备代表政府立场的份量。这就变成一个罗生门,可以依据网络流量,喜好,认可或者否认代不代表政府,然后,左右逢源,看好民意流向改变选举策略。


一般人说错说对,无伤大雅。甚至,没有人会发现,也没有会拿来做文章。但是,如果何晶说错了,说了民意不喜欢的,那就变成行动党的负资产,伤害很大。这对行动党支持的候选人将造成不利,甚至落选。


天时地利人和,似乎站在行动党支持的候选人那一边,也没有人会预料到,他拿不到竞选资格。(即使他在法庭上被定罪过)。只要有选举,就会出现变局,最可怜的是自动当选又再一次出现。那么,什么滑铁卢都可以免谈。


你认为何晶代不代表政府发言?她会不会成为行动党的负资产?





Comments

  1. 不同政见的异议者如果只能是一味的对着执政党呛声 -- 譬如一根食指直直的指责执政党的时候,却忽略了另外的三根手指反弯过来指着自己 -- 那就不仅是可怜了,好像也有点可悲。

    新加坡人必须知道的,是“选”总统这个游戏是执政党创造出来的“游戏” -- 那么游戏会有什么规矩就已经很明白,那就是绝对的对执政党“有利”。

    何晶讲的本来就是“大实话” -- 她的口气虽然有点儿轻蔑 -- 然而这就是事实 -- 一言以蔽之,执政党就是拥有对于新加坡每一件大小事的“话语权” -- 在一党独大的情景下,可以做鬼,可以为神 -- 也就是在翻云覆雨之余唯我独尊我武维扬。

    确切的说,要改变这种局面,就是“取而代之” -- 这一点,或许是新加坡的在野党阵营必须学习的“认知”。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...