Skip to main content

理性治国的总理 爱心护民的总统 新加坡成功之道,未来之路? 民选总统以降,爱心在哪里?

 理性治国的总理

爱心护民的总统

新加坡成功之道,未来之路?

民选总统以降,爱心在哪里?


民选总统和以前的总统有什么区别?似乎,非民选总统的爱心更加明显,更加受到尊敬。自从有民选总统以来,除了第一任王鼎昌外,似乎没有人关心储备,更加没有觉得这些民选总统有什么爱心,爱表现在何处?


政府给人感觉只知道钱的问题,债不留后代,消费税,加价,加费用等。虽然有执行力,但是却处处变得无情无义,欠缺爱心。


等待合格证的准总统候选人吴振华以脑和心来比喻总理和总统的职权区分。他认为总理是脑,拥有行政执行权。而根据宪法,总统犹如心的运作。脑和心是一个整体,不是两个中心,因此不可分割。


脑是理性的象征,依据原则、科学方式、数据来分析,依法治国,追求效率、生产力。因此,往往过于形式,欠缺人文考虑,过分依法治国,给人苛政猛于虎的感觉。


总统是国家的象征,团结人民,代表国家。因此,以心,作为爱的表现,关怀人民,体恤民间疾苦,有助纾解政府严酷,无情的一面。有爱心的总统,对于政府有加分作用,能够提高人民对政府的信任、信心。


可惜,民选总统推出以来,不但做不到团结,信任,反而加深人民对于这个制度的误解,怀疑和失去信心。新加坡人看不到爱心,见不着团结,更加不相信民选总统能够带来什么好处。



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...