Skip to main content

The Political Hawks in the PAP will accelerate the Downfall of the Party.

The Political Hawks in the PAP will accelerate the Downfall of the Party.



There are aggressive hawks and moderate hawks in the PAP.  This is to keep the balance of the party.  Since the so-called 3G leadership running the country, we have seen there are more and more hawks, the aggressive ones in the PAP. 


The recent developments, like the COP as well as the coming GST increase, indicate the aggressive political actions of the hawks, led by Lee Hsien Loong as prime minister.  The moderate hawks remain silent, maybe they like their compensation, maybe they want a happy retirement, maybe new recruits have to show their loyalty…Anyway their numbers are reducing from GE2011 to GE2020. The Presidential Election also shows the same trend, from don’t bother to useless.


Is this good for Singapore?


We laugh at Donald Trump and think many of his policies were insane and bad. Of course, he is still the target of the liberal media until today.        

With the aggressive hawks inside the PAP gaining more and more control and command of the party, (and also their aggressive political actions) a new Trump has come to Singapore.  


The PAP is now a one-sided party.  There is no balancing force within, no check and balance outside, no transparency inside and outside.  This is a party even without a clear future leader! So, they have to behave like hawks to hide their weakness.  


What will your future be if you allow this situation to continue and expand?  A pigeon waiting for a hawk? Or make a change! Or hoping the dinosaur will go into extinction?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...
275 comments
Read more

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...
65 comments
Read more

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...
50 comments
Read more