Skip to main content

报应来了,我代表被传召问话。 丢脸丢到印度去,李显龙以恐龙思维‘尼赫鲁的印度’看莫迪政府。结果,自取其辱。

 报应来了,我代表被传召问话。丢脸丢到印度去,李显龙以恐龙思维‘尼赫鲁的印度’看莫迪政府。结果,自取其辱。


『丢脸丢到印度去,我国驻印度最高专员

被传召问话。

报应啊!

自以为是,错用历史,误判印度国情。

当然,也误判了新加坡国情。』




(这只是一个开始。录像来自CNN.)



只看到眼前的利益,大言不惭在国会伟伦一番后,很快的报应就来了。印度莫迪政府认为李显龙错误的引用尼赫鲁的例子,并且不当使用。因此,传召新加坡驻印度最高专员。


自认聪明绝顶,对于国际局势和政治具有独特见解的李显龙,终于还是因为不了解印度国情,而得到报应。传召国家代表问话在国际外交上,属于严重事件。当然,如果你是美国、俄罗斯这样的大国,这是司空见惯经常遇到。不过,新加坡是一个小国,而且,新印还是伙伴关系。这就不寻常,不简单。


李显龙毕竟不是李光耀。当然,也对尼赫鲁时代的历史,没有父辈那么深的认识。或许,他更加应该举‘和他一起共享榴莲的纳吉’的马来西亚为例。马来西亚的确面对自由民主倒退的问题,国会里也真的有’尼赫鲁的印度‘例子里说的犯罪分子。这个例子连马来西亚人,甚至政府也应该会赞同。



莫迪政府为什么不高兴?1947年印度独立后,尼赫鲁出任总理,他的家族和甘地家族的国大党一直垄断印度政权几十年。一直到2014年,莫迪领导的人民党才把国大党拉下来。算起来,还不到10年啊!


李显龙害怕什么?如果我们像印度国会那样,出现不正直的议员,根据他的神逻辑,久而久之,最终,会出现换政府的情况。难怪,国大党认同他,而莫迪的人民党却不同意。李显龙最害怕,做了几十年的政府,好像印度国大党,马来西亚巫统,最后演变成反对党的角色。



李显龙为何这么短视?他以为所有的国家都不会换政府,而印度经过几十年国大党的统治后,终于换政府。如果,印度如他所说的自由民主倒退,那么,人民党如何上台做政府?难怪,国大党认为莫迪政府小题大做,不应该传召新加坡最高专员。人民党和国大党谁比较懂得治国,我们外人不适合评论。


但是,这个例子却足以说明,李显龙的心态:换政府不好,反对党都是不正直的,人民行动党最好。最恐怖的结论是,也是他的歪论:国会有反对党,就会出现不正直的议员,这些议员会导致自由民主政治倒退。这种恐龙思维,难怪人民行动党会出现接班人问题。而另一方面,通过这种手段试图、意图阻止忧心、有心为国贡献的人。


我们在印度的投资为何一筹莫展?连我们伟大的、最厉害的总理都误判印度国情,我们的商人、投资者,难道比总理还行吗?新加坡人听话,总理这么说,政府这么说,印度国情就是这样,这么走下去,结局当然就是空手而回。同样的,我们对于印度人才,外劳问题,也是很朝着这个思路发展。这个问题,大家有目共睹,已经变成新加坡的一个政治问题。最后,很可能发展到非华人不可任总理的课题上,为何印度裔不可以出任新加坡总理?


李显龙落后的恐龙思维,将是新加坡未来发展的绊脚石。70岁不言退,恐龙就快变成化石了。难道,新加坡也要随他一起化成化石吗?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...