Skip to main content

How To Convince Voters The Importance of Democracy, Transparency and Accountability


GE2015 results clearly shows that democracy, human rights, transparency, and accountability  are not so important as compared to economic achievements.  Many voters believe without the PAP Singapore will not have progressed ‘from third world to first world’ within 50 years. Many middle voters also choose to give the PAP a second chance.  

Will the coming Bukit Batok single member constituency by-election make a difference? How can Singapore Democratic Party effectively change the mind of BB voters in the next few months? What strategies can help to turn the table around?

SDP has a weak starting point, perhaps at 30% or at most 35%.  This will be the main contest between SDP and the PAP even there is a multi-corner by-election.  Even there is one to one contest, bookies will give the ‘win’ to the PAP.

And changing Singaporeans’ attitudes towards democracy, transparency and accountability is a huge challenge. Whether aggressively or passively promoting and engaging the change, the result is not impressive at all.

Interestingly in parliament, PM Lee Hsien Loong  discussed 5 key principles of Singapore political system early this year. In which, he also mentioned about accountability, open, contestable, and political stabilisers (the Presidency).

[“Most political systems have such stabilisers built in - either an upper house, like the Senate in the United States or the House of Lords in United Kingdom.”

“Singapore is too small to have either an upper house, or regional sets of Governments beyond Town Councils. But we too need stabilisers, especially in two areas: Protecting our reserves and safeguarding the integrity of the public service,” Mr Lee said.]

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/5-key-principles-for/2462640.html

Obviously, the PAP does not think ‘the checks and balances in the Parliament’ is a stabiliser. The obvious result of GE2015 seems to support this.

‘Bo chap’ or ‘don’t care’ political attitudes of many Singaporeans have also made the PAP their natural choice.

And SDP has to face an unfriendly press…..

How can SDP break the cycle? Their by-election campaign team has started working, how can they reach the heartlanders and residents in HDB flats?

Working harder than the PAP, perhaps, is the answer.

Look at this situation:
A Bernie Blackout    The New York Times.png
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/17/opinion/campaign-stops/a-bernie-blackout.html?

Bukit Batok by-election is a new learning experience for the oppositions whether there is a breakthrough or not.

This is the lesson not only for SDP but also for other opposition parties.

All the best and good luck, SDP!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...