Skip to main content

部长声明避重就轻:目的是要稳住支持者。

满纸荒唐言,一把辛酸泪。
都云作者痴,谁解其中味?《红楼梦》




【满纸荒唐言】
内政和代教育部长的国会声明,依旧是老方法,人民行动党的惯例。主要的目的是做给支持者看的。只要能够说服70%的选民继续相信声明的内容,主流媒体天天继续大篇幅报道声明内容,支持者是很难分辨是非,谁对谁错的。目的就是这么简单。
地铁停驶,巴士司机罢工,小印度暴动,。。。等等,回想一下,是不是避重就轻的报告?而选民继续相信行动党的那一套说服法,继续的支持。
因此,这次林家的不幸事件,当然可以用同样的避重就轻的方法过关。而声明的重点-尤其是网上言论不可信,更是行动党要传达的重中之重。只要能够把支持者的心说服,其他的都不重要。因此,再荒唐,再不人道,也无所谓。
行动党当然相信,支持者不会看重人权。因为,社会上一定要有人牺牲,即使无辜牺牲,但是能够为国家带来进步,也是值得。行动党处处强调TRADE-OFF, 就是这个道理。有人被不幸牺牲,大多数人却进步了,这是值得的。这就是行动党,(其实,只要仔细观察,美国共和党川普的言论似曾相识。)
部长声明当然没有提到如何保护人权,尤其是小孩的权利。这一点,行动党很清楚,支持者也不在意。听惯,看惯荒唐言,又不是第一回,多数人还是会相信行动党的。
【一把辛酸泪】
讲人权是动不了新加坡人的心,或许一把辛酸泪能够激起人性,人的同情心。就像去年三月的造神运动,一把辛酸泪,为行动党带来10%的选票。因此,只要行动党当权,造神运动年年都会进行,报道说,今年三月,新加坡就有100处造神运动。
造神运动,讲的是一把辛酸泪。林家的不幸难道不是一把辛酸泪吗?
  • 作为父母,您会关心孩子吗?
  • 作为祖父母,您会关怀孙子吗?
  • 作为亲戚朋友,亲戚、邻家的孩子怎么样了?您会问一问吗?
或许,行动党支持者什么都不管,但是,自己的孩子,总不能不关心吧?造神是一把辛酸泪,江山是哭出来的。
马房失火,孔子关心的是有没有人受伤。新加坡人可以不关心人权,但是,不可能不理家事。家里的一把辛酸泪,也同样反映出我们是一个怎么样的社会。
因此,在参与造神运动的过程中,我们要反思,反省,行动党倡导的一把辛酸泪,意义何在?为什么行动党的造神才是一把辛酸泪,而普通老百姓的一把辛酸泪就可以轻描淡写的带过?
【都云作者痴】
不要轻视行动党的满纸荒唐言,避重就轻的说服法,看起来像是白痴说梦话。但是,行动党通过控制国会,媒体,这些避重就轻的声明,很容易就成了支持者眼中的神话 - 造神运动的一部分。
什么意思?什么神话?网上的言论不可靠,不可信。网上的报道无中生有,报道错误,验尸庭还没有开庭,就先下结论。因此,将来考虑立法对付。
行动党手握内安法,如果网上的言论真的犯了大错,危害国家安全,早早就对付了。不然,就像对付不同意见的人那样,起诉,控告,就是行动党一贯的做法。为何不早早行动,而要利用国会的保护伞来说痴话?这一点,行动党是不需要向支持者交代的。
【谁解其中味】
谁真的理解一把辛酸泪?行动党朔造的造神运动中的一把辛酸泪,还是个人,国人的一把辛酸泪?
行动党支持者看到只是造神的版本,造神的一把辛酸泪。行动党处心积虑要朔造,要怀念的只是每年的造神运动。个中滋味,个人的一把辛酸泪,如何让行动党支持者体会到呢?
他们不会关心人权,也不希望行动党失去政权,怎么才能唤起人们内心深处的一把辛酸泪?只有从个人,家庭出发。当个人,家庭遇到一把辛酸泪,然后才能理解,作为父母,作为祖父母,作为亲戚朋友的一把辛酸泪。
新加坡人在务实的选择下,在考虑到个人和家庭的不幸时,想到有可能自己会不幸遇到一把辛酸泪的时候,或许,才能惊醒这’一把辛酸泪‘不仅限于造神,它与我们个人,家庭是息息相关的。
如果我们一直认为,只要造神,维护这个造神运动,我们就能相安无事,平平安安的度过一生,这很可能是这个人,这个家庭最大的赌博。这个赌博已经玩了50年,还要继续玩下去吗?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...