Skip to main content

PAP预算未来:梁山伯还是娶不到祝英台


【同床三年,梁山伯没有发现祝英台的女儿身。这么老实,难怪最后娶不到祝英台。和行动党同床50年,新加坡人也同样没有发现行动党的正身 - 狐狸的尾巴。难怪,行动党能够一直沿用朝三暮四的预算案,制造无数的梁山伯,娶不到美人归。】


说金禧年的预算案,为何离题到谈梁祝的爱情故事。梁山伯到死还是娶不到祝英台,和预算有什么关系?梁山伯太老实了,就像善良的新加坡人一样,身边是一位美女,还不知道,当发现的时候,已经太迟了。因此,最后娶不到老婆,气得吐血而死。人家梁山伯只糊涂了三年,许文远就在国会发表伟伦,那么,和老实新加坡人的50年相比,那就是要尽快发现,觉悟把行动党推翻,重新开始,才能娶到好老婆。不能再像梁山伯那样了。


为什么说今年的预算案是朝三暮四,说是梁山伯娶不到祝英台呢?这里先举出几个例子:


¥考试费免了,因为之前学费已经涨了。
¥路税减低,但是,汽油税却涨了。
¥55岁公积金会员首三万元,多得1%利息。因为,之前已经赚够了你们的血汗钱。
¥50岁以上公积金会员的公积金缴交率提高。因为以前把它特意的降下来,现在只是微调上升。
¥孩童和学生的教育基金补贴,类似公积金制度,进来容易,出去难。不够的时候,尤其是要和马家老板的孩子,祝家的女儿一起出游学习,梁山伯就要打工,或者当掉家当,不然,就只有弃权。


这种朝三暮四的做法,梁山伯不明白。人人都说政府大方的派钱,有的说这是罗宾汉解救没有钱的人,像梁山伯这样的学生有救了。有些形容这是达尔文的适者生存,到底是帮忙落者生存,还是富者越富?梁山伯怎么能够明白洋人的论调,什么罗宾汉,什么达尔文,梁山伯只是知道梁山好汉,项羽刘邦推翻秦朝。


梁山伯只知道听老师的话,听政府的话。因此,老实到缺少独立思考。他对意识形态的东西,言听计从。梁山伯其实对以下的政策是一知半解的:


# 25岁以上未来技能补足500元。
# 公积金顶限上调到6000元。
# 个人所得税回扣50%。
# 延后上调劳工税。
# 40岁以上教育培训课程最少津贴90%。


未来技能是什么?公积金顶限上调,所得税回扣,劳工税,教育津贴跟梁山伯无关。但是,人云亦云,大家说好,梁山伯也认为好,反正梁山伯是一个爱读书的的人。但是,这些钱是不可以拿出来的,比公积金还要不灵活,这不是梁山伯的 钱,是政府(利用人民的钱)给的钱,条件,使用方法,当然更加不方便。


梁山伯上网看了一下,突然发现,有反对党提出最低工资,免费教育,医药福利,甚至包括把新加坡政府投资投资公司,淡马锡,外汇储备重新管理,公开透明管理。因此,梁山伯很希望全民免费上网,这样才是智慧国的象征。可惜财政部长让他失望。为了对梁山伯进行思想教育,新预算提供梁山伯朝三暮四的意识形态,阻止他中反对党的毒,还要从以下方面让他认知失调:


@人民投诉贫富悬殊,新预算特意对最高收入者微微调高税率。
@人民投诉外汇管理不透明,现在政府把淡马锡的预期回报纳入可以使用的政府资金。
@捐款税务回扣调高和延长到2018年。
@10亿元注入国立研究基金。
@30亿元注入“樟宜机场发展基金”。


新财政预算案高调说“人民是经济转型的核心”。今年的预算主题是《共创美好未来,加强社会保障》。梁山伯给搞得糊涂,梁山伯是核心,梁山伯有美好未来,有社会保障?那么,梁山伯是否可以娶到祝英台?这是梁山伯最关心的。不然,死不瞑目。这些高调和主题,对梁山伯来说是曲高和寡,好像每一年都是如此。只是替代声音多了,朝三暮四的把戏就跟着多了。


财政预算案如果真的把人民当成核心,共创未来,强化保护网,就要让人民自由思考,让人民有话语权。 50年来,行动党政府一直通过意识形态来控制人民的思维,而梁山伯在礼教闪电教义下,根本就没有想到祝英台会女扮男装,他没有独立的思维,他无法摆脱行动党强加在他身上的思想束缚,而只能一味听许文远似是而非的辩论,并且接受这种命运的安排。


在行动党笔下,或者说在许文远的辩论原则下,梁山伯没有想到私奔过,没有想到放下功名到杭州做生意,没有想到其他女孩,甚至入赘豪门。更加没有,在三年里,想摸一摸祝英台的坏念头。梁山伯只有像许文远说的自哀自怨,自杀式的结束生命。这就是行动党给新加坡人安排的命运,您接接受吗?


如果接受,那么梁山伯在以人民为核心的新预算案中,最终的命运还是娶不到祝英台。因为,一介书生,梁山伯的财力物力,还有缺少独立思考的头脑,一定无法和祝英台家,祝英台许配的马家相比。50年来,只有40%新加坡人看清这个事实,新加坡的未来,核心人民,要依靠更加多人看清行动党的嘴脸。

金禧年的预算案,50年来没有改变,意识形态,思想控制健在。虽然步入中年,行动党并没有放松思想控制的打算,更加没有放弃fix反对党。预算案没有自由空气,如何打造新加坡的人才资源?行动党的预算案,就是要培养多几个梁山伯。而这些梁山伯最终还是娶不到祝英台。因为他们无法摆脱行动党的教条。

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 蒹葭苍苍,白露为霜.所谓伊人,在水一方.溯洄从之,道阻且长.溯游从之,宛在水中央.
    梁山伯在白衣人控制的国家里,永远找不到美女!所谓伊人,在水一方.水中的月亮,看得见的凄凉!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...