Skip to main content

新加坡50,公积金新措施,无助人民行动党选情。



【行动党50多年来,就是把人民当成猴子来耍,朝三暮四不满意就来个朝四暮三,选民务必看清这个把戏。】


无论公积金新改良措施,还是新加坡50的欢庆,都很像寓言故事《朝三暮四,朝四暮三》那样,把新加坡人民当成猴子来戏弄,当成猴子来耍 。

公积金会员希望拿出一笔钱,因此,就出台了一个20%。对最低存款不满,因此,就有三套方案的最低存款政策。当然,这些建议,行动党政府是全部接受。

为什么?

因为,这些都不是行动党的钱,是会员的血汗钱。猴子们既然不满意朝三暮四,那么,朝四暮三,你们应该就会高兴吧!记得在公积金新政策公布的第二天,星期四一早,就到超市去买东西,在收银处,一个中年收银员指着当天的早报头条说,现在可以拿部分公积金了。另一个却说,如果现在能够拿就最好。原先那个却说,到65岁才可以拿一部分。另一个回答说,65岁,我已经死掉了。刚好这时,我也付完钱,大家都哈哈大笑!

这个哈哈大笑,大家的解读很可能都不一样。但是,很可能是心照不宣,这对行动党政府,会是加分吗?走出商场的时候,听到两个保全人员在对话,一个说新公积金政策,将会lock(锁)住多20%公积金。另一个却跟他辩论。为什么会多锁住公积金存款?是不是一个误解?

事实上。公积金这一路上走来,到底有多少人了解公积金的真正运作,真正目的?

无论是误解,还是明白,总之,公积金是会员的血汗钱。行动党政府拿去用,怎么用,怎么投资,除了一个比较清楚的2.5%,或者4%利率外,其他的误解,误用,明白不明白,几十年来,人民已经习惯这套猴子戏。人民喜欢早上拿多一点,就让人民拿多一点。公积金新措施委员会的建议,不可能跳离这个指导原则,即是动来动去,只能动会员的钱,只能在这个圈子里打滚。

¥¥¥
再说回新加坡50的猴子戏,为了敬老,行动党政府拿出人民的钱来做庆祝活动。退休老师,退休公务员,都受到邀请出席晚宴,免费的一日游,还包括免费午餐。这些活动,不可能有100%出席率,有些60%,70%或者80%。不出席当然有很多原因,出席的也未必投行动党一票。

除了敬老,家庭条件比较差的,还获得医药优惠,减低家庭在这方面的开支。无论如何,这些花费,都不是行动党政府的钱,行动党只是拿人民的钱去慷慨一番。

人民的钱如何用,国家的钱如何用,公积金的钱如何用,这几十年的一党独大,似乎和人民无关。行动党喜欢怎么用,就怎么用。行动党还很大声的说,世界上没有免费的午餐,一份耕耘,一份收获。行动党似乎忘了,公积金的血汗钱,国家的储备,新加坡50的费用,这些都是人民的钱,人民是否同意这种用法?行动党当然说是,你们次次都选闪电,2011年,还超过60%,怎么会不同意这种用法,这种安排呢?

新加坡选民应该清楚知道自己的身份。全体新加坡人才是决定公积金如何安排,国家储备如何投资,政府活动如何花费的主人。这个主人不是行动党。因此,我们不应该再给行动党这个借口,它是依大多数选民的意愿行事的。如果,我们不喜欢行动党的这种安排,这种投资,这种花费,我们就要在选票上反映出来。

随着社交媒体的广泛使用,互联网的流行,行动党的过去表现,独断独行,横行霸道,已经开始一一现形。而行动党的什么新政策、新措施,欢庆活动,都无法唤起人民的的共鸣。这是行动党最害怕的,新加坡50,公积金新政策,对于人民来说,只是一场哈哈大笑。背后代表了什么,行动党不知道。

对于行动党来说,2015年的任何政策改良、改变、改进,还是欢庆、节日,周年活动,都是拉票的好机会。但是,在刚刚过去的几十天,不论是新加坡50,还是公积金新措施,都无法拉抬行动党选情。雪上加霜还包括大宝森节活动的处理手法,农历新年亮灯的惊吓画面,诉讼案件的傻傻处理等等,行动党真的是度日如年,举步艰难。

新加坡人民的觉醒,让行动党度日如年,举步艰难。再加上流年不利,告人不顺利,搞欢庆也出事,不知道接下来,行动党还会有什么厄运?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sub-standard PAP and the Singapore education system

I make a 'policy shift' when I hear the debate of right politics, constructive politics and sub-standard opposition. My original aim is to discuss about “Su Dongbo, Zhang Juzheng and Singapore education system”. The discussion will end with a sub-standard PAP, in particular from the assessment of the quality of PAP potential candidates. Another policy shift is to discuss it like a play, a drama and make it more entertainment rather than a sub-standard political discussion. Act 1 Gangster’s demand Imagine a sense in the Hong Kong's gangster movie (or a godfather movie), the gangsters' master is shouting at his poor opponent and demand him to give a price for his wrong act. The poor guy without any resources can only offer his body or his service to work for the master. Back in his own chamber, the master is still not satisfied and continues to shout 'don't play, play, you think you are hero, you think you are tiger, or superstar or acting ...

EBRC objectives: Stop “Out of Aljunied”, Stop SDP Breakthrough and “Negative-Asset” Ministers.

First of all, we have to congratulate the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee for creating more competitions, especially, multi-cornered competitions in the East. When making changes, EBRC aims to achieve 3 goals: To prevent “Out of Aljunied” for Workers’ Party.  This is the most important objective. To prevent Singapore Democratic Party making any breakthrough in the North and Central.   To look for a solution to retire “negative-asset” ministers or reduce PAP damages. From the reported claims from different political parties, we will expect multi-cornered contests not only in single constituencies but also in group representative constituencies. The PAP hopes to have a repeat of 2011 Presidential Election. Then Tony Tan won the Presidency when he got only 35% of the votes, a narrow win.However, a win is still a win. He did in even in the very last minute, after recounts of votes.    How to achieve multi-cornered contests? By i...

Is Prism Project Another Central Planning of the PAP?

There are 3 scenarios under the Prism Project#1 of Institute of Public Policy.  However, it looks more like the central scenario planning of the People’s Action Party. From the instructional menu of Prism Project Primer #2, participants were guided to a situation in 2022 and they have to imagine, within the Primer framework, to come out with 3 possible scenarios in Jun-Aug 2012.  2022. What a coincidence! Not long ago, PM Lee declared that he would like to hold the prime minister post for another 10 years. The other coincidence is the similarity between the 3 scenarios and the candidates of PE2011. How competitive and sustainable are the 3 scenarios to the people of Singapore and to the PAP?   Will the scenarios produce competitive and sustainable Singapore, Singaporeans or the PAP?  Perhaps, as what the Chinese say: planning cannot always catch up with changes.   And planning sometimes turns out the wrong, bad and unexpected results, espec...